2014
DOI: 10.5376/ijms.2014.04.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population dynamic and Species diversity of wintering waterbirds in mangroves wetland (Persian Gulf) in 1983 and 2013

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, monitoring of pollutants such as DDT and organochlorines, and the effects of variations in hydroperiod in the Everglades were carried out using water and wading bird species (Frederick et al, 2009; Lavoie et al, 2010; Lantz, Gawlik & Cook, 2011; Boyle, Dorn & Cook, 2012). Moreover, bird diversity has been used as an indicator of temporal changes in mangrove health (Behrouzi-Rad, 2014), and to assess the impacts of climate change and coastal development (Ogden et al, 2014). While avian community monitoring can be a useful tool for evaluating the health of wetland ecosystems, its use for assessment of ecological restoration has been rarely employed (Weller, 1995; Cui et al, 2009; Gyurácz, Bánhidi & Csuka, 2011; Li et al, 2011; Catterall et al, 2012; Zou et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, monitoring of pollutants such as DDT and organochlorines, and the effects of variations in hydroperiod in the Everglades were carried out using water and wading bird species (Frederick et al, 2009; Lavoie et al, 2010; Lantz, Gawlik & Cook, 2011; Boyle, Dorn & Cook, 2012). Moreover, bird diversity has been used as an indicator of temporal changes in mangrove health (Behrouzi-Rad, 2014), and to assess the impacts of climate change and coastal development (Ogden et al, 2014). While avian community monitoring can be a useful tool for evaluating the health of wetland ecosystems, its use for assessment of ecological restoration has been rarely employed (Weller, 1995; Cui et al, 2009; Gyurácz, Bánhidi & Csuka, 2011; Li et al, 2011; Catterall et al, 2012; Zou et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneous area consisted of more vegetation mosaic, such as scrubs, bushes, mangroves, and dense tree vegetation to attract more avifaunas families [32]. By the time of degradation occurrence, the entire family in the degraded site presented an adaptation to respond to habitat change [17]. They might be adapted by opened areas, potentially provided a location for grooming and hunting [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mangroves provided environmental services for avifauna, including shelters, foraging, and breeding site [15]. In addition, mangroves also facilitated the hiding and perching place [16], especially for the niches of water birds and arboreal bird families [17]. For mangrove restoration efforts, the avifauna parameter assessment such as species diversity, abundance, families community structure, and specialization roles could be the key factors to monitor the success of long-term mangrove restoration [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mangroves are one of the most prolific and productive ecosystems on earth (Borges, 2003;Behrouz-Rad, 2014). It not only nurtures abundant aquatic life, but also plays an irreplaceable role in sequestering and storing carbon and maintaining sustainable development (Wang et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%