Three density. reduction methods were evaluated in earthen crawfish ponds to control overpopulation in order to mitigate density-related growth suppression and effect a greater production of large (> 22 g) crawfish. Treatments consisted of physical removal of crawfish with small-mesh-bottom traps, application of urea fertilizer with hydrated lime to create toxic levels of un-ionized ammonia, temporary draining of ponds to expose vulnerable crawfish to biological hazards, and a typical management approach (no density reduction) as a control. Density reduction measures were initiated in early February before harvesting began in late February. The temporary drain and urea applications were effective in significantly reducing crawfish population densities as indicated by dip net, baited trap, and unbaited entrapment samplings. Furthermore, forage depletion rates were significantly decreased in these two density-reduced treatments, indicating reduced grazing by lower crawfish numbers. The average size-at-harvest and proportions of large crawfish were greatest in the temporary drain and urea treatments. Mean .weights of harvested crawfish were 15.9, 14.8, 23.6, and 22.1 g for ,the control, physical-removal, urea application, and temporary drain treatments, respectively. In the control and physical-removal ueatments, only 18% and 10% of the harvested crawfish, respectively, were in the two largest size categories. In the urea application and temporary drain treatments, 68% and 61% of the crawfish, respectively, were in