2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-008-9648-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population estimators or progeny tests: what is the best method to assess null allele frequencies at SSR loci?

Abstract: Nuclear SSRs are notorious for having relatively high frequencies of null alleles, i.e. alleles that fail to amplify and are thus recessive and undetected in heterozygotes. In this paper, we compare two kinds of approaches for estimating null allele frequencies at seven nuclear microsatellite markers in three French Fagus sylvatica populations: (1) maximum likelihood methods that compare observed and expected homozygote frequencies in the population under the assumption of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and (2) di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(25 reference statements)
2
50
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, positive F IS values were only revealed for single SSR markers and not constantly across all loci, suggesting that they were not due to inbreeding, but rather due to null alleles that indeed were detected for a few SSR markers. However, null alleles were at very low frequency and were not expected to largely bias the population genetic parameters [65]. In general, no statistically significant differences of the genetic diversity indices were detected between adult stands and seedlings.…”
Section: Neutral Genetic Variationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Nevertheless, positive F IS values were only revealed for single SSR markers and not constantly across all loci, suggesting that they were not due to inbreeding, but rather due to null alleles that indeed were detected for a few SSR markers. However, null alleles were at very low frequency and were not expected to largely bias the population genetic parameters [65]. In general, no statistically significant differences of the genetic diversity indices were detected between adult stands and seedlings.…”
Section: Neutral Genetic Variationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In addition, the frequencies of null alleles were directly estimated by using the program INEst, running the individual inbreeding model (IIM) with a Gibbs sampler of 10 5 iterations (Chybicki and Burczyk, 2009a). An estimate of null allele frequencies in the data sets from French stands based on different approaches was also conducted by Oddou-Muratorio et al (2009). To take into account possible genotyping errors during microsatellite scoring, we accommodated loci for which the presence of null alleles was suspected, and performed parentage analysis following different approaches, as suggested in recent literature (Bacles and Ennos, 2008;Oddou-Muratorio et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR amplifications were performed following the conditions reported in Pastorelli et al (2003) and fragment size detection was conducted as described by Buiteveld et al (2007). To rule out amplification failure due to laboratory errors or poor DNA quality, PCR was performed at least twice on samples without any amplification product, and DNA was re-isolated when amplification failure was systematic across loci (Oddou-Muratorio et al, 2009). …”
Section: Study Sites Sample Collection and Microsatellite Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology was implemented in the software GENEPOP 4.0 (Rousset 2008). This statistical approach gives similar results to direct comparison between the maternal alleles and offspring as shown in Oddou-Muratorio et al (2008). The established procedure allowed detection of the percentage of null allele frequencies at each plot.…”
Section: Discarding Markers With Null Allelesmentioning
confidence: 99%