2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population exacerbation incidence contains predictive information of acute exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in telecare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models that were heterogeneously ensemble by Voting generally performed well (over half of the heterogeneously integrated models were in the top 10 of all model units). And the optimal model obtained in this paper outperforms the prediction performance of some of previous studies [14,56,57], indicating that the joint ensemble framework is feasible to some degree. Furthermore, in this study, we innovatively use the comprehensive sorting and summing method to assign scores to all models, and nally evaluate the overall performance of the models by the combined scores, which provides an evaluation mode for selecting the model with the best overall performance according to the focus of the research area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Models that were heterogeneously ensemble by Voting generally performed well (over half of the heterogeneously integrated models were in the top 10 of all model units). And the optimal model obtained in this paper outperforms the prediction performance of some of previous studies [14,56,57], indicating that the joint ensemble framework is feasible to some degree. Furthermore, in this study, we innovatively use the comprehensive sorting and summing method to assign scores to all models, and nally evaluate the overall performance of the models by the combined scores, which provides an evaluation mode for selecting the model with the best overall performance according to the focus of the research area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%