2009
DOI: 10.1007/bf03191137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population genetic structure of three major river Populations of rohu,Labeo rohita (Cyprinidae: Cypriniformes) using microsatellite DNA markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
21
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
21
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The present findings contradict the findings of Alam et al, (2009) where they used four microsatellite loci for population genetic analysis of Labeo rohita samples from three rivers of Bangladesh and found observed heterozygosity to be less than expected heterozygosity with positive inbreeding coefficient which was correlated with the reduction in population size due to overexploitation, contamination of gene pool through introgression, bottleneck effect, habitat degradation, environmental pollution, etc..…”
Section: Microsatellite Based Genetic Variations Between the Populationscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The present findings contradict the findings of Alam et al, (2009) where they used four microsatellite loci for population genetic analysis of Labeo rohita samples from three rivers of Bangladesh and found observed heterozygosity to be less than expected heterozygosity with positive inbreeding coefficient which was correlated with the reduction in population size due to overexploitation, contamination of gene pool through introgression, bottleneck effect, habitat degradation, environmental pollution, etc..…”
Section: Microsatellite Based Genetic Variations Between the Populationscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We observed that average observed heterozygosity and expected heterozygosity was lower than that of obtained in the study by Das et al (2005) but higher than that of obtained by Alam et al (2009). Moreover, heterozygosity in the hybrid population was also fairly good with the observed value of 0.542±0.292 and expected value of 0.534±0.176; that indicated positive heterosis through strains crossing of rohu.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Again in these same four loci the average observed heterozygosity and expected heterozygosity were 0.746 and 0.621 (Das et al, 2005) and 0.413 and 0.493 (Alam et al, 2009) in the Indian major carp populations. We observed that average observed heterozygosity and expected heterozygosity was lower than that of obtained in the study by Das et al (2005) but higher than that of obtained by Alam et al (2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations