Abstract:Genetic techniques are increasingly employed in the field of conservation biology, and sea turtle conservation is no exception. Our understanding of sea turtle biology, and particularly of sea turtle migrations and population structures, has increased through genetic analyses that 'match' turtles found in various and often widely distributed habitats (e.g. nesting beaches, foraging grounds, migratory corridors). This relatively recent technological development has implications for how sea turtles are conceived, both as resources and as objects of conservation. Traditionally, turtle populations have been attached to particular nesting beaches, and most conservation efforts have focused on these discrete geographic locations (sometimes including off-shore waters), and have been undertaken by the state. The more complete understanding of relationships among turtles found in geographically disparate areas, achieved via genetic analysis, can take conservation beyond the beaches and territorial waters of individual states. Nesting populations can now be linked to foraging populations sometimes hundreds of kilometers distant. In this paper, we explore the implications of genetic analysis for sea turtle conservation, the scale at which it is undertaken, and the variety of actors with competing interests in it. We focus on the case of hawksbill sea turtles in the Caribbean Sea. Conflicts over hawksbill conservation have spurred genetic analysis and genetic analysis has been applied in attempts to resolve those conflicts. We are particularly interested in the way genetic information encourages the scaling up of sea turtle conservation, and how it simultaneously strengthens and weakens claims of individual nation states, obscures claims of local level actors, and strengthens claims of external actors. We draw on political ecology, science studies, and common pool resource theory to explore these transitions and their consequences.