2012
DOI: 10.3354/meps09659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population genetics of Australian white sharks reveals fine-scale spatial structure, transoceanic dispersal events and low effective population sizes

Abstract: Despite international protection of white sharks Carcharodon carcharias, important conservation parameters such as abundance, population structure and genetic diversity are largely unknown. The tissue of 97 predominately juvenile white sharks sampled from spatially distant eastern and southwestern Australian coastlines was sequenced for the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region and genotyped with 6 nuclear-encoded microsatellite loci. MtDNA population structure was found between the eastern and southwestern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
98
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
10
98
1
Order By: Relevance
“…white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), Blower et al 2012; sandbar shark (Carcharias plumbeus), Portnoy et al 2010). In contrast, the few genetic studies of pelagic sharks that are predominantly distributed in the open ocean all suggest weak or no genetic structure at an inter-or intraoceanic scale (shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus), Heist et al 1996; basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus), Hoelzel et al 2006; whale shark (Rhincodon typus), Castro et al 2007; silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis), Cabrera-Chávez-Costa et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), Blower et al 2012; sandbar shark (Carcharias plumbeus), Portnoy et al 2010). In contrast, the few genetic studies of pelagic sharks that are predominantly distributed in the open ocean all suggest weak or no genetic structure at an inter-or intraoceanic scale (shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus), Heist et al 1996; basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus), Hoelzel et al 2006; whale shark (Rhincodon typus), Castro et al 2007; silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis), Cabrera-Chávez-Costa et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Coastally oriented shark species may exhibit strong population subdivision associated with limited vagility and female philopatry. Such species are additionally vulnerable to overexploitation due to their coastal residence, and these factors combined often result in low CN e values and CN e : N C ratios between 0.5 and 1.0 (Portnoy et al, 2009;Blower et al, 2012). In other coastal species that exhibit high vagility and/or low male philopatry, resultant higher levels of gene flow obscure differentiation at nuclear loci and lead to greater N e (Schultz et al, 2008;Karl et al, 2011).…”
Section: Effective Population Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strong female-biased sex ratio in Mozambique, in addition to higher site affinity by females, suggests that this area is a refuge habitat for females and may be an important breeding and/or pupping site for M. alfredi (Marshall et al 2011a). Molecular genetic analyses on several elasmobranch species suggest greater levels of philopatry in females than males (e.g., Schrey and Heist 2003;Blower et al 2012). Male M. alfredi may also roam more than females, which return more regularly to a natal or pupping site.…”
Section: Population Structurementioning
confidence: 99%