2003
DOI: 10.1080/00369220318737173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population geographies for the 21st century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This ‘integrative’ population geography thus involves methodological approaches that would speak to a wide range of audiences in both more applied and theoretical circles. For example, as Findlay (2003, p. 187) writes, “It is only with combined strengths in both qualitative and quantitative methods that population geographers can deliver a strong theory‐led evidence‐based contribution to knowledge that is relevant both to the rest of human geography and to the wider community of users of population research.” Whereas human geography may currently be more interested in social theory, spatial demographic approaches with GIS may be of greater interest to policy communities and disciplines outside of geography. As such, population geographers trained in both spatial demographic approaches and social theory are particularly well‐suited to engage with both the turn toward ‘space’ in demography, but also can be conversant with theoretically inclined research developments in human geography.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ‘integrative’ population geography thus involves methodological approaches that would speak to a wide range of audiences in both more applied and theoretical circles. For example, as Findlay (2003, p. 187) writes, “It is only with combined strengths in both qualitative and quantitative methods that population geographers can deliver a strong theory‐led evidence‐based contribution to knowledge that is relevant both to the rest of human geography and to the wider community of users of population research.” Whereas human geography may currently be more interested in social theory, spatial demographic approaches with GIS may be of greater interest to policy communities and disciplines outside of geography. As such, population geographers trained in both spatial demographic approaches and social theory are particularly well‐suited to engage with both the turn toward ‘space’ in demography, but also can be conversant with theoretically inclined research developments in human geography.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent changes in population structure, driven by increases in in-migration and increases in fertility, have partly mitigated population decline, but have done little to address the overall long-term ageing of the population structure. This paper has illustrated the importance demographic changes have for understanding the labour market and policy making in Scotland, highlighting the relevance of demography in these areas (see Findlay, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graham also pushed towards not just philosophical but also political considerations in her criticism of the Eurocentrism of transition theory and the need for a critical population geography (Graham, 2000). This argument has perhaps been made most forcefully in Findlay's discussion of population geography in the twenty-first century (Findlay, 2003). Here Findlay took on many of the developments that had come from an engagement with theory.…”
Section: Foucault's Population Geographies 149mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tools used to do this, and the disciplinary path followed, has led to recent concerns over the insularity of the subdiscipline and attempts to import and utilise theories from geography and beyond (Findlay and Graham, 1991;Jackson and White, 1995;Graham, 1999;McKendrick, 1999). However, the call to (re)theorise has recently been declaimed as weary and as one that acculturates a feeling of marginality amongst population geographers (Findlay, 2003). Allan Findlay suggests two lines of action: firstly, to show how central to social thinking the concept of population actually is, and secondly to deploy the traditional strengths of population geographers in a critical fashion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%