1977
DOI: 10.1093/ee/6.1.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Growth and Mating Success of Indian Meal Moths 1 and Almond Moths 1 in the Presence of Synthetic Sex Pheromone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, Vick et al (1978) recorded significant mating disruption with the sex pheromone. The above studies by Sower & Whitmer (1977), and by Vick et al (1978) demonstrated the important interplay among pest population density, pheromone dose, and disruption efficacy for both species. Two emerging trends from these studies were the reduced efficacy of mating disruption at high pest densities, as well as improved disruption with increasing pheromone concentrations (Sower & Whitmer, 1977;Vick et al, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Later, Vick et al (1978) recorded significant mating disruption with the sex pheromone. The above studies by Sower & Whitmer (1977), and by Vick et al (1978) demonstrated the important interplay among pest population density, pheromone dose, and disruption efficacy for both species. Two emerging trends from these studies were the reduced efficacy of mating disruption at high pest densities, as well as improved disruption with increasing pheromone concentrations (Sower & Whitmer, 1977;Vick et al, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The few attempts to investigate the efficacy of pheromone-mediated mating disruption of both P. interpunctella and S. cerealella, have yielded inconsis-tent results. Sower et al (1975) and Sower & Whitmer (1977) recorded reductions in the mating frequency and population growth rate of P. interpunctella with high concentrations of Z9,E12-14:Ac. , however, reported the inefficacy of pheromone for the disruption of P. interpunctella in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The attract-and-kill, or attracticide, method is similar to mass-trapping, but instead of using traps, which can saturate with dead moths and need servicing, an insecticide-treated surface is coupled with the pheromone lure so that males contact the insecticide briefly and then die soon after (72,83). Mating disruption, in which a treatment area is saturated with an unnaturally high concentration of synthetic sex pheromone and males are unable to locate and successfully mate with females, has proven successful for stored-product moths under controlled conditions (101), and recently in commercial field settings (82,95). Government registration of a pheromone for the expressed purpose of controlling an insect pest population is required in the United States.…”
Section: Wwwannualreviewsorg • Managing Stored-product Insectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…REICHMUTH et al (613) showed the utility of pheromone traps for early detection of the tobacco moth, Ephestia elutella, and the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. SOWER et al (614,615) showed that mating frequency of the Indian meal moth and the almond moth, E. cautella, was effectively reduced at low population densities. WHEATLEY (107) and HAINES (617) also reported that mating frequency of the almond moth was reduced, and that detection and survey traps would be feasible and very useful for this pest and several related species.…”
Section: Lepidopteramentioning
confidence: 99%