Population growth rates of weed species in response to herbicide programme intensity and their impact on weed community

Abstract

The adoption of dicamba-tolerant crops has reduced the challenge of controlling glyphosate-resistant Amaranthus palmeri in these crops. However, introducing herbicide programmes with new mechanisms of action and different intensities can favour major shifts in weed communities. This can affect not only the functionality of the agroecosystem, but also resource availability to the most problematic species. The objectives of this work were to evaluate how herbicide programme structure and intensity affect (a) weed diversity, (b) population growth rate (λ) of weed species and (c) weed community structure based on λ dynamics in a dicamba-tolerant cotton monoculture. To achieve these objectives, a cotton field experiment was established to compare four herbicide programmes from 2011 to 2018. The herbicide programmes differed in the first 4 years (i.e. glyphosate every year, alternating glyphosate and glyphosate plus dicamba every other year, glyphosate plus dicamba every year, and residual herbicide and glyphosate plus dicamba every year). During the last 4 years, all programmes received glyphosate plus dicamba. The weed seedbank was evaluated every spring and λ calculated. Environmental variation from year to year was more important in determining weed richness than herbicide programmes, which exhibited similar richness across all treatments during the eight years of the study. Regardless of herbicide programme, most species maintained λ between zero and one. Only a few species were the exception with λ values above one, such as A. palmeri, Mollugo verticillata and Eleusine indica. Although glyphosate plus dicamba reduced λ for several species, this herbicide mix was less effective in reducing λ for other weeds compared with glyphosate alone, suggesting a potential antagonism that could change weed community composition. The limited changes in λ for most species suggest the capacity of weeds to adjust reproduction and survival to overcome changes in mortality rates caused by increases in herbicide use intensity.

Demographics of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in annual and perennial cover crops

“…In the absence of additional management tactics, we can expect continual additions of weed seed to the seedbank. In other studies, the addition of herbicide to the production system further reduces the population growth rate compared with the levels seen in our study and alters weed community composition trajectories from season to season (Oreja et al 2021(Oreja et al , 2022a(Oreja et al , 2022b.…”

Previous crop and herbicide timing application effects on weed population growth rate

“…These results highlight the importance of considering population growth rates when assessing the efficacy of integrated weed management programs rather than relying only on absolute numbers of seedlings or plants. Relying only on absolute number of plants as measure of success can result in increasing problems in the mid‐ or long‐term (Oreja et al., 2021).…”

Biological effects on Palmer amaranth surviving glufosinate

“…Currently, there is no peer‐reviewed literature providing data on quantifying vegetative‐stage Palmer amaranth fecundity after surviving glufosinate and the implication of different application timings. If Palmer amaranth remains fecund after glufosinate treatment, it would be important to determine whether the offspring exhibit differential germination or susceptibility to glufosinate (Oreja et al., 2021). Previous research suggests Palmer amaranth can evolve resistance to herbicide(s) when recurrently treated with sublethal doses (Neve & Powles, 2005; Tehranchian et al., 2017; Vieira et al., 2020).…”