2012
DOI: 10.14214/sf.905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population history, genetic variation and conservation status of the endangered birch species Betula nana L. in Poland

Abstract: P. 2012. Population history, genetic variation and conservation status of the endangered birch species Betula nana L. in Poland. Silva Fennica 46(4): 465-477.The effective conservation of species requires data on the levels and distribution of genetic diversity within and among populations. In this study, we estimated the genetic variation in three isolated populations of Betula nana in Poland. An analysis of 11 nuclear microsatellites revealed moderate mean heterozygosities (H O = 0.556, H E = 0.562), low mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest and lowest levels of microsatellite variation were recorded in the LIN and IZER samples, respectively (Jadwiszczak et al 2012). In turn, AFLPs were most variable in IZER and least variable in LIN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The highest and lowest levels of microsatellite variation were recorded in the LIN and IZER samples, respectively (Jadwiszczak et al 2012). In turn, AFLPs were most variable in IZER and least variable in LIN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…More numerous markers appear to be more conclusive in the evaluation of population genetic diversity despite the codominant and multiallelic state of microsatellites (Mariette et al 2002;Gaudeul et al 2004). Additionally, the presence of null alleles, which can decrease the level of genetic variation assessed by the microsatellites, was not excluded at some microsatellite loci in the B. nana study (Jadwiszczak et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations