2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population immunity of natural infection, primary-series vaccination, and booster vaccination in Qatar during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational study

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed pattern indicated a dose-response relationship where a higher number of vaccine doses elicited greater protection. While affirming the protective effects of vaccination within this population 15,20,33,44 and corroborating global literature, 45,46 this finding further emphasizes the criticality of vaccination for older persons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observed pattern indicated a dose-response relationship where a higher number of vaccine doses elicited greater protection. While affirming the protective effects of vaccination within this population 15,20,33,44 and corroborating global literature, 45,46 this finding further emphasizes the criticality of vaccination for older persons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Despite a protective effect for vaccination against infection, the magnitude of protection was notably much smaller (over the entire time of follow-up) compared with that against severe COVID-19. This divergence can be attributed to the rapid waning of vaccine protection against infection, which lasts for only a few months after the last dose, 15,21,33,[44][45][46][47] and thus did not extend over the three years of follow-up in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effectiveness of natural infection against reinfection was estimated, both overall and by time since previous infection utilizing 3-month intervals, using the test-negative, case-control study design. 2,4,[25][26][27][28][29] This design compares the odds of previous infection among SARS-CoV-2positive tests (cases) and SARS-CoV-2-negative tests (controls). 2,4,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Cases and controls were defined as SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative tests conducted during the analysis period, respectively.…”
Section: Study Population and Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,4,[25][26][27][28][29] This design compares the odds of previous infection among SARS-CoV-2positive tests (cases) and SARS-CoV-2-negative tests (controls). 2,4,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Cases and controls were defined as SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative tests conducted during the analysis period, respectively. SARS-CoV-2 reinfection is conventionally defined as a documented infection ≥90 days after a previous infection, to avoid misclassifying prolonged test positivity as reinfection with shorter time intervals.…”
Section: Study Population and Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%