2001
DOI: 10.1029/2001wr000321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population index flood method for regional frequency analysis

Abstract: Abstract. Regional frequency analyses based on index flood procedures have been used within the hydrologic community since 1960. It appears that when the index flood method was first suggested, the index flood was taken to be the at-site population mean, which, in turn, in the last two or three decades, has been estimated by the at-site sample mean. The objectives of this paper are to investigate the consequences of replacing a population characteristic with its sample counterpart and to propose an analyticall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various limitations of regional analysis have been raised right from the start of its use [26], including the distortion that arises from dividing the peak flows by their sample mean instead of the unknown population mean [90,91], spatial heterogeneity of regions (i.e., the distribution of scaled flows not being identical across sites [61]), and spatial dependence of high flows [41,90]. Nevertheless, it is rare that regional analysis has been expressed in terms of a formal statistical model (e.g., including explicit assumptions about how the parameters of the GEV distribution vary within the region).…”
Section: Regional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various limitations of regional analysis have been raised right from the start of its use [26], including the distortion that arises from dividing the peak flows by their sample mean instead of the unknown population mean [90,91], spatial heterogeneity of regions (i.e., the distribution of scaled flows not being identical across sites [61]), and spatial dependence of high flows [41,90]. Nevertheless, it is rare that regional analysis has been expressed in terms of a formal statistical model (e.g., including explicit assumptions about how the parameters of the GEV distribution vary within the region).…”
Section: Regional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of observed data for distribution fitting of extreme values in hydrological sciences can be overcome by using regional approaches, including index value approach (Darlymple, 1960;Sveinsson et al, 2001). This implies that values of a hydrological variable that are scaled, i.e.…”
Section: T Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robson and Reed, 1999) or by a site to site location parameter (e.g. Sveinsson et al, 2001). Here, the mean of the single site distribution is used, estimated by the sample average of the observed values at the specific site i, defined as…”
Section: Index Value Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, Darlymple (1960) and Hosking and Wallis (1993) used the observed sample mean as estimator of the index flood, Robson and Reed (1999) suggested the observed median (middle ranking value in the series of annual maximum flood), while Sveinsson et al (2001) propose, as index flood, the location parameter determined on a site to site basis. In the framework of the Flood Evaluation (VAPI) project, carried out by the National Group for Prevention from Hydrological Disasters (GNDCI) supported by the National Research Council (CNR) of Italy, flood peak estimation guidelines were provided for the whole of Italy and the index flood is represented by the expected value of the maximum annual flood peak (De Michele and Rosso, 2001) [ ]…”
Section: General Remarks On Index Flood Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%