Population Mobility and the Transmission Risk of the COVID-19 in Wuhan, China

Abstract

At the beginning of 2020, a suddenly appearing novel coronavirus (COVID-19) rapidly spread around the world. The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in China occurred during the Spring Festival when a large number of migrants traveled between cities, which greatly increased the infection risk of COVID-19 across the country. Financially supported by the Wuhan government, and based on cellphone signaling data from Unicom (a mobile phone carrier) and Baidu location-based data, this paper analyzed the effects that city dwellers, non-commuters, commuters, and people seeking medical services had on the transmission risk of COVID-19 in the early days of the pandemic in Wuhan. The paper also evaluated the effects of the city lockdown policy on the spread of the pandemic outside and inside Wuhan. The results show that although the daily business activities in the South China Seafood Wholesale Market and nearby commuters’ travel behaviors concentrated in the Hankou area, a certain proportion of these people were distributed in the Wuchang and Hanyang areas. The areas with relatively high infection risks of COVID-19 were scattered across Wuhan during the early outbreak of the pandemic. The lockdown in Wuhan closed the passageways of external transport at the very beginning, largely decreasing migrant population and effectively preventing the spread of the pandemic to the outside. However, the Wuhan lockdown had little effect on preventing the spread of the pandemic within Wuhan at that time. During this period, a large amount of patients who went to hospitals for medical services were exposed to a high risk of cross-infection without precaution awareness. The pandemic kept dispersing in three towns until the improvement of the capacity of medical treatment, the management of closed communities, the national support to Wuhan, and the implementation of a series of emergency responses at the same time. The findings in this paper reveal the spatiotemporal features of the dispersal of infection risk of COVID-19 and the effects of the prevention and control measures during the early days of the pandemic. The findings were adopted by the Wuhan government to make corresponding policies and could also provide supports to the control of the pandemic in the other regions and countries.

How do the smart travel ban policy and intercity travel pattern affect COVID-19 trends? Lessons learned from Iran

“…For each 1% increase of population inflows, the number of confirmed cases is predicted to increase by 5.98%. Consequently, the quarantine policy has been effectively reduced the rate of disease spread within the country [ 19 ]. Besides, studies indicated that the continuous UK government’s guidance to avoid non-essential travel, combined with the closure of schools and reduced operation of London Underground and national railway services, contributed to a continuous reduction in human mobility and effectively contained the pandemic during the first wave [ 20 ].…”

Forecasting COVID-19 spreading through an ensemble of classical and machine learning models: Spain’s case study

“… Mobility data can be misleading, as they do not always equate to risk of infection, because certain activities may suppose more risk of infection than others, regardless of the level of mobility required for each of them. For example, in 46 it is mentioned that markets and other shopping malls with frequent visitors were areas with high risk of infection (in the case of Wuhan, China), so, in general, mobility to these types of places may suppose a higher exposure to the disease. In addition, we only had the actual data on Wednesdays and Sundays, from which we had to infer the values for the rest of the days.…”

The Mental Health Impact of Quarantine in COVID-19 Pandemic

“…The outbreak of COVID-19 came during the Spring Festival in China, which means that many people need to travel from city to city every day. The large population and the advanced public transportation, including the intro and inter-city mobility, make it easy to lead a person carrying the COVID-19 spread to the other cities [35]. Besides, globalization has altered the way we live and earn our livelihood.…”