2006
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00420-05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Pharmacokinetics of Arbekacin in Patients Infected with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: Arbekacin, a derivative of dibekacin, is an aminoglycoside developed and widely used in Japan for the treatment of patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The population pharmacokinetics of arbekacin was investigated in the Japanese, using 353 patients infected with MRSA and 50 healthy or renally impaired volunteers. The age of the study population ranged from 8 to 95 years, and weight ranged from 10.8 to 107 kg. In total, 1,581 serum arbekacin concentrations were measured (p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggest that it may also be necessary to lower the standard trough drug level a little more, but the recommended level could not be determined from the relationship between the presence or absence of adverse reactions and the blood drug levels in the present study (t test: trough level, P = 0.1368; peak level, P = 0.1898). In addition, it is necessary to extend the dose interval when renal function is compromised [14]. The dose interval was set at 36 h in one patient and 48 h in five patients, and five of the six patients showed response to the drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results suggest that it may also be necessary to lower the standard trough drug level a little more, but the recommended level could not be determined from the relationship between the presence or absence of adverse reactions and the blood drug levels in the present study (t test: trough level, P = 0.1368; peak level, P = 0.1898). In addition, it is necessary to extend the dose interval when renal function is compromised [14]. The dose interval was set at 36 h in one patient and 48 h in five patients, and five of the six patients showed response to the drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical data were obtained from a noninterventional observational study performed at 51 institutions, members of The Anti-MRSA Drug TDM Study Group (see Acknowledgments) from 1999 through 2002 (21). The serum drug concentration data of hospitalized patients treated with arbekacin for a suspected MRSA infection were collected as routine therapeutic drug monitoring data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete details on the population pharmacokinetic modeling and results for arbekacin are described in the companion article (21). Briefly, arbekacin pharmacokinetics was described using a two-compartment model with elimination of the central compartment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the dose-dependent adverse effects are closely related to the trough concentration (Ctrough > 2 mg/mL) of the drug [2]. The population pharmacokinetics of arbekacin in Japanese patients, concentration-response relationships of arbekacin, and optimal concentration targets of arbekacin for efficacy and safety have been previously reported [2,13]. However, further population pharmacokinetic analyses have been necessary to better estimate the population pharmacokinetic parameters in order to accurately predict the pharmacokinetic parameters for each patient infected with various disease types, such as bacteremia and pneumonia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Further studies have been necessary to investigate the changes in the pharmacokinetics during the hypermetabolic phase, such as physiological changes. Clinical pharmacokinetic studies of arbekacin evaluating changes in patients with different types of infections have been limited by a small number of trials, small sample sizes, varying populations and methodological differences [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%