2016
DOI: 10.21236/ad1007507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Representation in the Military ServicesFY 2014

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample also lacked substantial racial or gender diversity, with 60.2% Caucasians and 90% men. These percentages are not far from those in the population of enlisted U.S. military persons, however (70% Caucasians, 15% women; Quester & Shuford, 2017). Still, findings cannot be readily generalized to women or those outside of U.S. military culture.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The sample also lacked substantial racial or gender diversity, with 60.2% Caucasians and 90% men. These percentages are not far from those in the population of enlisted U.S. military persons, however (70% Caucasians, 15% women; Quester & Shuford, 2017). Still, findings cannot be readily generalized to women or those outside of U.S. military culture.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…To maintain a high level of quality in clinical research, the NIH expects that sex will be factored into research design, analysis, and reporting of all human studies. 40 Despite representing only 15% of the total military force, 44 females accounted for 39.1% of the patients undergoing hip arthroscopy in these studies. This leads to 2 possible conclusions based on the available data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…To maintain a high level of quality in clinical research, the NIH expects that sex will be factored into research design, analysis, and reporting of all human studies. 40 Despite representing only 15% of the total military force, 44 females accounted for 39.1% of the patients 43 mHHS at 10-to 55-mo follow-up 11 of 14 (78.6%) females were in the medical disability evaluation board group vs only 3 of 19 (15.8%) males.58% of female patients were somewhat or very satisfied with the results of their procedure at final follow-up vs 86% of male patients.No sex difference in mHHS once MEB status was accounted for. Ernat (2015) 17 Return-to-duty status at minimum 2-y follow-up Male-to-female comparison: no significant differences in pain on VAS (P ¼ .102); no significant differences in pain and function via the NAHS (P ¼ .886) Bennett (2016) 5 Pain VAS, NAHS, FAA Mean change in VAS pain for overall cohort: 25.7 (95% CI, 19.4-31.99); difference between males and females (P ¼ .102) Mean change in NAHS for overall cohort: 15.9 (95% CI, 12.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%