1985
DOI: 10.1086/284332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Size and Extinction: A Note on Determining Critical Population Sizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
8

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
74
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Concern about the long-term persistence of populations (Smith 1974;Geist 1975;Shaffer & Sampson 1985;Goodman 1987;Newmark 1987) has led to questions about the size a population should be to minimize its chances of extinction (Gilpin & Diamond 1980;Wilcox & Murphy 1985). Until now, only evidence from simulation models (Soulé et al 1979;Diamond 1984;Harris et al 1987;Iwasa & Mochhizuki 1988), from avian turnover rates (Pimm et al 1988), and of the historical loss of species of unknown population sizes (Brown 1971;Patterson 1984) has been available to suggest how long isolated mammalian populations persist, and it has not been possible to assess the generality of the models or conservation tactics (Lande 1988).…”
Section: Methods Sources Of Data and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concern about the long-term persistence of populations (Smith 1974;Geist 1975;Shaffer & Sampson 1985;Goodman 1987;Newmark 1987) has led to questions about the size a population should be to minimize its chances of extinction (Gilpin & Diamond 1980;Wilcox & Murphy 1985). Until now, only evidence from simulation models (Soulé et al 1979;Diamond 1984;Harris et al 1987;Iwasa & Mochhizuki 1988), from avian turnover rates (Pimm et al 1988), and of the historical loss of species of unknown population sizes (Brown 1971;Patterson 1984) has been available to suggest how long isolated mammalian populations persist, and it has not been possible to assess the generality of the models or conservation tactics (Lande 1988).…”
Section: Methods Sources Of Data and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some biologists have questioned this emphasis, and suggested that nongenetic factors such as demographic stochasticity and environmental factors that cause small population size have overriding importance in natural populations (Simberloff 1988, Caughley 1994, Caro and Laurenson 1994. Furthermore, theory indicates that, at the point populations are sufficiently small for inbreeding to become important, demographic and environmental stochasticity are likely to cause extinction regardless of inbreeding depression (Lande 1988, Schaffer and Samson 1985, Menges 1991. Other models linking genetic and demographic processes, however, indicate that these may interact to increase extinction risk of small populations (Mills and Smouse 1994, Tanaka 1997, Jaquie´ry et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even a few predators can have substantial impacts on prey demography (Nogales et al, 2004) and increase the risk of catastrophic extinction (Schoener et al, 2001), a concern on a hurricane-prone island. Because smaller populations often face a greater likelihood of extinction (Shaffer & Sampson, 1985), even the loss of a few birds can severely affect a species as rare as the Puerto Rican parrot.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%