2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-007-0641-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population structure and genetic variation in the genus Dipteronia Oliv. (Aceraceae) endemic to China as revealed by cpSSR analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morphologically, the two genera obviously differ from each other in characters, such as the outline of samaras, the presence or absence of bud scales, the arrangement of leaves, and the chromosome number, while the two species of Dipteronia are very similar and distinguishable only on the basis of glabrous or hairy inflorescences, and sizes of leaves and nutlets. In AFLP-and cpSSR-based population genetic studies of the genus Dipteronia, we revealed a significantly high level of genetic differentiation between D. sinensis and D. dyerana; the two species shared no common cpSSR haplotype, and the same gene sequence evolved differently within each species (Yang et al 2007(Yang et al , 2008. In the present study, the placements of D. dyerana generated from the four plastid regions (trnL-F, psbM-trnD, trnD-trnT, and rpl16) were different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Morphologically, the two genera obviously differ from each other in characters, such as the outline of samaras, the presence or absence of bud scales, the arrangement of leaves, and the chromosome number, while the two species of Dipteronia are very similar and distinguishable only on the basis of glabrous or hairy inflorescences, and sizes of leaves and nutlets. In AFLP-and cpSSR-based population genetic studies of the genus Dipteronia, we revealed a significantly high level of genetic differentiation between D. sinensis and D. dyerana; the two species shared no common cpSSR haplotype, and the same gene sequence evolved differently within each species (Yang et al 2007(Yang et al , 2008. In the present study, the placements of D. dyerana generated from the four plastid regions (trnL-F, psbM-trnD, trnD-trnT, and rpl16) were different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, the authors' former studies on Dipteronia showed that a significantly high level of genetic differentiation occurred between D. sinensis and D. dyerana ( F ST = 0.3904, F ST = 0.4424) by both amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and chloroplast simple sequence repeat (cpSSR) analyses, and no common haplotype was observed between D. sinensis and D. dyerana in cpSSR analysis (Yang et al 2007(Yang et al , 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As relic species of the Tertiary period, both species of Dipteronia have experienced long complex evolutionary histories to result in their current distributional status. Previous research based on analyses of chloroplast simple sequence repeats (cpSSRs) and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) revealed that significant genetic differences are present between D. sinensis and D. dyeriana ; these analyses also suggested that the populations of Dipteronia may have suffered a genetic bottleneck (Yang et al, 2007 , 2008 ). However, a clear understanding of the causes of their genetic divergence and speciation has still not been achieved; this is largely because of the lack of genomic resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is also meaningful to trace the evolutionary dynamics of these two tertiary relict plants. Previous studies of Dipteronia have focused on universal genetic markers, morphologic divergence and/or seed physical and chemical properties [5,6,7,8] and only few genetic diversity studies were analyzed based on AFLP and cpSSR [9,10]. However, studies on speciation, demographic history, genomic variation and adaptive divergence of Dipteronia were not widely conducted, possibly due to limited genomic resources and genetic markers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%