2017
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Structure of Sclerotinia subarctica and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in England, Scotland and Norway

Abstract: Sclerotinia species are important fungal pathogens of a wide range of crops and wild host plants. While the biology and population structure of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum has been well-studied, little information is available for the related species S. subarctica. In this study, Sclerotinia isolates were collected from different crop plants and the wild host Ranuculus ficaria (meadow buttercup) in England, Scotland, and Norway to determine the incidence of Sclerotinia subarctica and examine the population struct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The four S. sclerotiorum isolates used in this study were obtained from infected lettuce (L6, L44), pea (P7) and buttercup ( Ranunculus acris , DG4) from different locations in England. These isolates also represented different genotypes, as identified previously using microsatellite markers (Clarkson et al ., ; Table ). The pathogenicity of these isolates had been tested previously against three Brassica species, with L6 and P7 identified as aggressive, L44 as intermediate and DG4 as weak in terms of their virulence (Taylor et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The four S. sclerotiorum isolates used in this study were obtained from infected lettuce (L6, L44), pea (P7) and buttercup ( Ranunculus acris , DG4) from different locations in England. These isolates also represented different genotypes, as identified previously using microsatellite markers (Clarkson et al ., ; Table ). The pathogenicity of these isolates had been tested previously against three Brassica species, with L6 and P7 identified as aggressive, L44 as intermediate and DG4 as weak in terms of their virulence (Taylor et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A single isolate of S. subarctica (isolate HE1 from wild buttercup) was also included for comparison; this related pathogen often produces larger sclerotia than S. sclerotiorum isolates (Clarkson et al ., ). Isolates represented different microsatellite haplotypes assigned through a previous study investigating the population structure of S. sclerotiorum and S. subarctica in the UK (Clarkson et al ., ; Table ). In addition, the relative aggressiveness of the same 18 isolates had also been evaluated previously on three brassica hosts (Taylor et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The locality and host of the original S. sclerotiorum isolates were: Geraldton (canola, 2014), Eneabba [lupin ( Lupinus angustifolius L.), 2013], Mount Barker (canola, 2014) and South Stirling (canola, 2014) in the grain belt of Western Australia. Based on intergenic spacer sequencing (IGS), these S. sclerotiorum isolates were comprised of haplotypes IGS3, IGS5 and IGS7 . Upon canola senescence, mature sclerotia were collected from canola stalks and sieved (CMT Equipment, Tweed Heads, NSW, Australia) into three size fractions (<3, 3–4 and >4 mm) (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%