2011
DOI: 10.2172/1047606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population viability analysis of the Endangered shortnose sturgeon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because bottom and surface measurements were not significantly different, we used an average of the two, if both were available, and the single available measurement, if not. Longitudinal variation in temperature was not significant, but season explained at least 94% of variation in water temperatures (sine term in equation 3) measured by Jager et al (2011Jager et al ( ) in 2007Jager et al ( -2009. In the Ogeechee River, water temperature also showed a significant decrease in response to increased total flow.…”
Section: Dynamic Habitat Qualitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Because bottom and surface measurements were not significantly different, we used an average of the two, if both were available, and the single available measurement, if not. Longitudinal variation in temperature was not significant, but season explained at least 94% of variation in water temperatures (sine term in equation 3) measured by Jager et al (2011Jager et al ( ) in 2007Jager et al ( -2009. In the Ogeechee River, water temperature also showed a significant decrease in response to increased total flow.…”
Section: Dynamic Habitat Qualitymentioning
confidence: 90%