2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Populations of domesticated cattle and buffalo in the Western Forest Complex of Thailand and their possible impacts on the wildlife community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2562 (2019) of Thailand (Royal Thai Government Gazette, 2019). Habitat loss and degradation (Srikosamatara, 1993;Prayurasiddhi, 1997) and human disturbances (Gardner, 2014;Gardner et al, 2016;Chaiyarat et al, 2018) have significantly affected banteng and reduced their population, as has commercial hunting (Srikosamatara & Suteethorn, 1995;Chaiyarat et al, 2018) and disease transmitted by domestic cattle (B. taurus and B. indicus) that still occur in some protected areas (Chaiyarat & Srikosamatara, 2009). Accidental hybridization in the wild and active inbreeding between banteng and domestic cattle in captivity to develop the livestock industry reduces the purity of the genetic status of both the wild and captive populations (Purwantara et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2562 (2019) of Thailand (Royal Thai Government Gazette, 2019). Habitat loss and degradation (Srikosamatara, 1993;Prayurasiddhi, 1997) and human disturbances (Gardner, 2014;Gardner et al, 2016;Chaiyarat et al, 2018) have significantly affected banteng and reduced their population, as has commercial hunting (Srikosamatara & Suteethorn, 1995;Chaiyarat et al, 2018) and disease transmitted by domestic cattle (B. taurus and B. indicus) that still occur in some protected areas (Chaiyarat & Srikosamatara, 2009). Accidental hybridization in the wild and active inbreeding between banteng and domestic cattle in captivity to develop the livestock industry reduces the purity of the genetic status of both the wild and captive populations (Purwantara et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, 50% of this protected area is invaded by domestic animals. Chaiyarat and Srikosamatara [17] found that the population of domestic cattle in Salakphra Wildlife Sanctuary was greater than 16,000 individuals based on interviews. The number of domestic cattle is still increasing dramatically (P. Prempree, asst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural resources, livestock and forests are all related to each other as human populations have clear-cut woodland to develop pastureland for livestock for thousands of years (Chaiyarat and Srikosamatara, 2009;Foley et al, 2005). Livestock grazing of wild lands may have many ecological impacts, such as degradation of soil, erosion by overgrazing, pollution of air and water resources (Chaiyarat and Srikosamatara, 2009;Neumann et al, 2009), alteration of habitat complexity and function through changes in vegetation structure, composition and density influencing wildlife population densities (Beck and Mitchell, 2000;Davies et al, 2010;Fleischner, 1994;Johnston and Anthony, 2008;Vavra, 2005). Forest management practices have also been shown to strongly influence the abundance and richness of wildlife (Fredericksen et al, 2000;Heydon and Bulloh, 1996;Sidorovich et al, 2008), possibly in response to associated habitat disturbance, to the reduction in overstory cover, to changes in the abundance of food plants, and to the presence of logging slash (Fredericksen et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%