Populism or Nationalism? The ‘Paradoxical’ Non-Emergence of Populism in Cyprus

Abstract

This article investigates the curious non-emergence of populism in contemporary Cyprus despite the deep financial crisis and profound political disillusionment – conditions that are treated as necessary and sufficient. Putting emphasis on Cyprus’ key historical particularities, the article inquires into the ways Cyprus’ political past, and the subsequent salient ‘national question’, produce ambiguous notions of ‘the people’ on the one hand, and impede the potentials for a ‘populist moment’ on the other hand. By assessing the performative dynamics of oppositional parties in Cyprus, the empirical analysis suggests that the absence of populism is rooted in the following factors: First, nationalist discourse prevails over, and significantly weakens, populist discourse. Second, self-proclaimed challenger parties served ‘old wine in new bottles’ further undermining their position and claims. The failure of populism to take root in Cyprus, brings to the fore important theoretical insights relevant to the non-emergence of populism even under favourable conditions.

Bound to fail? Assessing contemporary left populism

“…Following the perspective advanced by the Essex School of Discourse Analysis, we ought to highlight here that “the people” and “the elite” are not mere rhetorical references in a political actor's narrative. Such an understanding misses the dynamic and performative status of political discourse, which is critical in understanding the construction of political identities and the passionate attachments they can generate (Venizelos, 2021). In our Laclau‐inspired conceptualization, populism—like all political discourses with hegemonic pretensions—allows the formation of a salient collective identification through which heterogeneous social demands and exclusions find a way to establish links allowing them to challenge effectively the status quo.…”

When nationalism beats populism: The secessionist movement in Texas

“…Whereas the nationalist logic acts horizontally, determining who is inside or outside the national community, the populist logic acts vertically, producing a boundary between those who are part of the people and those who belong to the elite (De Cleen & Stavrakakis, 2017). Although both logics can be articulated in the same discursive structure, the prevalence of one over the other will be determined by the constitution of the people as underdog or the people as nation (Ruiz Casado, 2020; Venizelos, 2021).…”

Donald Trump in Power: Discourse, Performativity, Identification

“… 13. From a discourse-theoretical as well as non-European perspective (specifically Latin America and United States), it is even questionable whether Trump is a populist. In discourse-theoretical accounts, populism is structured around the understanding of the people as an empty signifier, whereas in the case of Trump, the people takes on very specific content based on a pure and exclusionary identity, effectively filling the emptiness of the collective subject (Venizelos, 2021). In Latin American accounts, leaders such as Trump (and Bolsonaro) are thought of as representing the privileged few – the elites, essentially punching downwards, towards the underprivileged subaltern subjectivities (Casullo, 2020).…”