2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-012-0288-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus detection in Thailand during 2005–2010 in relation to clinical problems, pig types, regions, and seasons

Abstract: The objectives of the present study were to determine the prevalence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in Thailand between 2005 and 2010. The study was conducted by retrospectively investigating the detection of PRRSV from different pig types including boars, sows, piglets, nursery pigs, and fattening pigs from six regions of Thailand, i.e., the northern, eastern, northeastern, central, western, and southern parts. The data were obtained from cases submitted to the Chulalongkorn Un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in support of Sharma (2011) our study also confirms that PRRS virus is infecting pigs of Nepal and spreading to many regions. Regarding PRRS status in other countries, there was prevalence of 32.6% of PRRS antibody sero-positive samples in pigs of Thailand which is quite higher than this study (Tummaruk et al, 2013). According to Montagnaro et al,37.7% (129/342) sero-positive samples were found for PRRS in wild boars in Campania, southern Italy which is also very much higher than our finding (Montagnaro et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…However, in support of Sharma (2011) our study also confirms that PRRS virus is infecting pigs of Nepal and spreading to many regions. Regarding PRRS status in other countries, there was prevalence of 32.6% of PRRS antibody sero-positive samples in pigs of Thailand which is quite higher than this study (Tummaruk et al, 2013). According to Montagnaro et al,37.7% (129/342) sero-positive samples were found for PRRS in wild boars in Campania, southern Italy which is also very much higher than our finding (Montagnaro et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Herd location and general management : The herds were located in the eastern (A and G), middle (B, D, E, I and J), northeastern (C and H) and southern (F) parts of Thailand. All herds were breeding herds with 900 to 5,000 sows per herd and were defined as PRRS virus-positive herds according to the results of a commercial ELISA test (HerdChek ® PRRSV antibody test kit 2XR ® , IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, ME, U.S.A.) and a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of the herd’s monitoring data [ 26 ]. Gilts and sows were housed in a conventional open housing system with equipment, e.g., water sprinklers, fans and roofs with heat reflecting material, to reduce the impact of high temperatures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identical viruses were present in different provinces [5]. The PRRSV infected pigs are often co-infected with M. hyopneumoniae and other agents causing porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) [2,3]. The prevalence M. hyopneumoniae was previously reported at 2.08-45.00% in domestic pigs in Thaiand [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Both genotype 1 and genotype 2 of PRRSV were detected in domestic pig farms in all regions of Thailand. Prevalence of PRRSV in domestic pigs in the country varied from 24.6-53.6% and the prevalence was 32.7% in the central region [3] where the density of domestic pig population is high. The recorded pig density in this region according to previous study was between 0.00 and 777.56 heads per square kilometer [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%