2021
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2021.735647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore Connectivity Characterization Using Coupled Wood’s Metal Intrusion and High-Resolution Imaging: A Case of the Silurian Longmaxi Shales From the Sichuan Basin, China

Abstract: Pore connectivity is crucial for shale gas production. However, the three-dimensional (3D) characteristics and distribution of pore networks and, more fundamentally, the underlying role of different pore types on pore connectivity in shales are inadequately understood. By comparing the 3D pore connectivity derived from direct microstructural imaging of pores filled with Wood’s metal at a pressure corresponding to the finest accessible pore throat in the resolution ranges that may be achieved by X-ray micro-CT … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As inorganic pores are the main pore type at the micrometer scale in the shale samples investigated, Sample W-23, the laminated calcareous shale, has the best inorganic pore connectivity; Sample D-36, the laminated siliceous shale, ranks second; while Sample J-24, the massive siliceous shale, has the worst inorganic pore connectivity. This quantitative evaluation result is consistent with the qualitative assessment from previous research (Yu et al, 2021). Samples with low Pc are both laminated shales with well-developed microfractures, indicating that such fractures can significantly enhance the pore connectivity (Figs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As inorganic pores are the main pore type at the micrometer scale in the shale samples investigated, Sample W-23, the laminated calcareous shale, has the best inorganic pore connectivity; Sample D-36, the laminated siliceous shale, ranks second; while Sample J-24, the massive siliceous shale, has the worst inorganic pore connectivity. This quantitative evaluation result is consistent with the qualitative assessment from previous research (Yu et al, 2021). Samples with low Pc are both laminated shales with well-developed microfractures, indicating that such fractures can significantly enhance the pore connectivity (Figs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…2) from the Silurian Wufeng and Longmaxi formations in the Fuling District, Chongqing, SE Sichuan Basin were selected for investigation. Wood's Metal Alloy was injected into the shales under high pressure using the procedure of Yu et al (2021) before X-ray micro CT imaging to improve the contrast of pores. Wood's Metal Alloy is a low melting point metal that can be pressed into shale pores in a molten state under high pressure at 85-100℃, and filled in shale pores in a solid form after cooling to room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such delamination is probably due to pressure relief during the progressive 'unloading' of the serpentinite as it approaches or reaches the Earth's surface. Furthermore, the intermittent drying of the sample either within the lithosphere or during sample preparation could have resulted in similar delamination porosity, mirroring the phenomena observed in clay (Desbois et al 2009;Rodriguez et al 2014;Yu et al 2021). In general, decompression leads to fractures and affects macroscopic-scale properties of rocks, such as the elastic modulus, without significantly altering their microscopic structures (Auzende et al 2015; Wei et al 2017).…”
Section: Porosity Within the Brucite Layer At The Interface And Withi...mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Low-pressure N 2 adsorption and MICP are effective methods for measuring pore volumes and characterizing types of pores in porous media [35]. The characteristics of samples from the WF-LMX Formation during N 2 adsorption and MICP measurements are displayed in Figures 3 and 4, respectively, and the associated pore size distribution data are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Pore Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%