2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4686(02)00839-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore initiation and growth on n-InP(100)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a square organization of Al 2 O 3 pores [37]. The principle of controlling the formation of a nanostructure by inducing a local defect was also employed by Lehmann and coworkers for Si [38] or Schmuki et al for InP [39]. This work reviews the results obtained by the recently established novel method for the fabrication of metallic nanostructures from directionally solidified and electrochemically treated eutectics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…a square organization of Al 2 O 3 pores [37]. The principle of controlling the formation of a nanostructure by inducing a local defect was also employed by Lehmann and coworkers for Si [38] or Schmuki et al for InP [39]. This work reviews the results obtained by the recently established novel method for the fabrication of metallic nanostructures from directionally solidified and electrochemically treated eutectics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The porous III-V compounds are most noteworthy and might have applications beyond nonlinear optics, because there are possible pore structures which cannot be produced with Si [7]. Porous GaAs [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and porous InP [15][16][17] to the bulk materials have been revealed [8,18]. The present work is an extension of previous works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Much of the initial InP surface appears to be intact but it is regularly penetrated by a high density of surface pits (~200 μm -2 ). These surface pits are said to form at defect sites on the surface (22), and result in the formation of porous domains below the surface (16). Figure 5 (b) is an SEM micrograph of the (100) surface of a porous layer formed at 3.0 V but with an etch time that was increased by a factor of three, resulting in a total etch time of 12 minutes.…”
Section: Potentiostatic Etching Of Porous Layers In Kclmentioning
confidence: 99%