2016
DOI: 10.1680/jgele.16.00065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore pressure based method to quantify smear around a vertical drain

Abstract: Radial consolidation testing of Ballina clay (New South Wales, Australia) was carried out using a large-scale consolidometer 650 mm in diameter. In this study, the characteristics of the smear zone were evaluated on the basis of hydraulic gradient changes derived from the measured excess pore pressure data in the radial direction. The extent of the smear zone determined using this technique is compared with past approaches, where the variations in water content and lateral permeability were adopted to evaluate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slurry and pre-consolidation method was employed to prepare the soil samples (Choudhary et al, 2016). Firstly, the soil was first cut into small chunks and immersed in distilled water for two days, after which the soil fractions were passed through a No.…”
Section: Soil Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slurry and pre-consolidation method was employed to prepare the soil samples (Choudhary et al, 2016). Firstly, the soil was first cut into small chunks and immersed in distilled water for two days, after which the soil fractions were passed through a No.…”
Section: Soil Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bergado et al [11] and Sharma and Xio [23] conducted model tests in large diameter cell and reported that the radius of the smear zone is two times the mandrel radius and four times the radius of the drain, and average permeability in the smear zone is 1.3 times smaller than in the undisturbed zone, respectively. Choudhary et al [24] proposed smear zone extent as 2.5 times mandrel diameter, determined graphically using excess pore pressure data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%