2007
DOI: 10.1029/2007gl031840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore‐scale spectral induced polarization signatures associated with FeS biomineral transformations

Abstract: We measured spectral induced polarization (SIP) signatures in sand columns during (1) FeS biomineralization produced by sulfate reducing bacteria (Desulfovibrio vulgaris) under anaerobic conditions, and (2) subsequent biomineral dissolution upon return to an aerobic state. The low‐frequency (0.1–10 Hz peak) relaxations produced during biomineralization can be modeled with a Cole‐Cole formulation, from which the evolution of the polarization magnitude and relaxation length scale can be estimated. We find that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They found secondary minerals such as sulfide precipitates produced phase anomalies of up to 60 mrad associated with both abiotic and microbial precipitation of iron and zinc sulfides (Ntarlagiannis et al, , 2010a(Ntarlagiannis et al, , 2010bWilliams et al, 2005;Slater et al, 2007;Personna et al, 2008). Laboratory experiments on sediments from the biostimulation field site at Rifle, CO, agreed with field results suggesting that redox active ions may play an important role in the observed SIP signals (Williams et al, 2009) but highlighted that more controlled experiments were needed (Ntarlagiannis et al, 2010b).…”
Section: '% ( )And% ('supporting
confidence: 70%
“…They found secondary minerals such as sulfide precipitates produced phase anomalies of up to 60 mrad associated with both abiotic and microbial precipitation of iron and zinc sulfides (Ntarlagiannis et al, , 2010a(Ntarlagiannis et al, , 2010bWilliams et al, 2005;Slater et al, 2007;Personna et al, 2008). Laboratory experiments on sediments from the biostimulation field site at Rifle, CO, agreed with field results suggesting that redox active ions may play an important role in the observed SIP signals (Williams et al, 2009) but highlighted that more controlled experiments were needed (Ntarlagiannis et al, 2010b).…”
Section: '% ( )And% ('supporting
confidence: 70%
“…An expanding volume of literature demonstrates that electrical signals result from the geochemical and physical alteration of porous media associated with microbe-mineral transformations of electrically conductive mineral phases. The geoelectrical signatures arising during biomineralization of metallic iron sulfide (FeS) by sulfate-reducing microorganisms have received almost exclusive attention [Slater et al, 2007;Williams et al, 2005]. The electrical properties of FeS minerals clearly support geoelectrical monitoring of FeS biomineralization, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, geophysical methods have been employed to image physical properties of the subsurface, and only recently have geophysical responses been linked indirectly to microbial activity ͑Atekwana et Atekwana and Slater, 2009͒. The need to more precisely correlate the effects of mineral surfaces, microbes, and the products of microbial activity with common geophysical measurements has led to an increasing number of laboratory studies ͑Ntarlagiannis et al, 2005a; Williams et al, 2005;Davis et al, 2006;Slater et al, 2007;Personna et al, 2008;Abdel Aal et al, 2009͒ and initial field studies designed to validate upscaling of the approach ͑Williams et al, 2009͒. One of the most successful methods is the SIP technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SIP ͑or complex-conductivity͒ method appears to be sensitive to ͑1͒ the presence of microbial cells ͑Ntarlagiannis et al, 2005b͒, ͑2͒ biofilm formation ͑Davis et al, 2006͒, and ͑3͒ microbialinduced sulfide mineral precipitation ͑Ntarlagiannis et al, 2005a; Williams et al, 2005;Slater et al, 2007;Personna et al, 2008͒. In the absence of metallic minerals, the SIP phase responses attributed to microbial cells and biofilm formation are small ͑1.5-mrad phaseshift maximum͒, and they require meticulous instrument calibration and careful measurement protocol ͑Ntarlagiannis et al, 2005b; Davis et al, 2006͒. In contrast, the precipitation of metallic minerals, including metal sulfides, generates significantly larger SIP responses, at least an order of magnitude higher ͑15-mrad phase shift͒, yielding anomalies that are easier to detect and monitor ͑Ntarlagiannis et al, 2005a;Williams et al, 2005;Slater et al, 2007;Personna et al, 2008͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%