2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020wr027568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore‐Scale Study of Water Adsorption and Subsequent Methane Transport in Clay in the Presence of Wettability Heterogeneity

Abstract: Clay minerals are abundant in shale, characterized by a lamellar structure and dimensions smaller than a micron, giving rise to nanometer-scale pore sizes and large specific surface area. They are commonly associated with water. However, the spatial distribution of the unsaturated water in clay is not very well understood, which significantly affects the subsequent shale gas flow capacity. Wettability heterogeneity in the presence of hydrocarbons further complicates the water distribution in clay. In this stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During a thermal evolution process, oxygen functional groups are gradually lost, and the surfaces of OM pores become hydrophobic. Therefore, this approach is a relatively accurate method for a mature or postmature shale sample while it may result in remarkable deviations for an immature one. Shale is a nanoporous media, and its pores are interconnected with each other to form a complex network. During the water or low-pressure N 2 adsorption–desorption process, a condensation effect in small nanopores may lead to gas phase trapping in connected large pores, while the latter will not appear on the APSD curves. , This phenomenon can result in an underestimation of a BJH pore volume. In our proposed method, illite is assumed to be representative of IOM because (i) the main clay composition of our shale samples is illite, and (ii) most IOM nanopores smaller than 200 nm mainly exist in clay minerals. , There is no doubt that clay type will influence the accuracy of our method. In my previous study, the APSD curves of different clay minerals (i.e., smectite, illite, and kaolinite) show the same condensation phenomenon in smaller nanopores (<5 nm) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During a thermal evolution process, oxygen functional groups are gradually lost, and the surfaces of OM pores become hydrophobic. Therefore, this approach is a relatively accurate method for a mature or postmature shale sample while it may result in remarkable deviations for an immature one. Shale is a nanoporous media, and its pores are interconnected with each other to form a complex network. During the water or low-pressure N 2 adsorption–desorption process, a condensation effect in small nanopores may lead to gas phase trapping in connected large pores, while the latter will not appear on the APSD curves. , This phenomenon can result in an underestimation of a BJH pore volume. In our proposed method, illite is assumed to be representative of IOM because (i) the main clay composition of our shale samples is illite, and (ii) most IOM nanopores smaller than 200 nm mainly exist in clay minerals. , There is no doubt that clay type will influence the accuracy of our method. In my previous study, the APSD curves of different clay minerals (i.e., smectite, illite, and kaolinite) show the same condensation phenomenon in smaller nanopores (<5 nm) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shale is a nanoporous media, and its pores are interconnected with each other to form a complex network. During the water or low-pressure N 2 adsorption–desorption process, a condensation effect in small nanopores may lead to gas phase trapping in connected large pores, while the latter will not appear on the APSD curves. , This phenomenon can result in an underestimation of a BJH pore volume.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(a) Fluid transport behaviour in shale nanopores with realistic surfaces: although the elementary compositions and molecular structures of OM and IOM can be obtained with chemical analysis, nanopores with realistic surface properties still cannot be fully structured in MD simulations, including the maturity of OM, surface charge of IOM, surface roughness, and the wettability heterogeneity of pore surfaces, which can have significant influences on gas adsorption and water transport. [265][266][267] (b) The properties of fluids in nanopores: for gas transport, multicomponent gas transport in nanopores should be paid more attention; for water transport, pure water can be extended to a saline solution or non-Newtonian fluid. [35,268,269] (c) Compared with single-phase transport, simulation of multiphase transport in shale nanopores is insufficient: the flow pattern and interfacial interactions of multiple fluids at the nanoscale are still unclear.…”
Section: Nanoconfined Fluid Flow Under a Complex Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these models vary in their complexity, their application can often be restricted to small, simple domains (single pore systems with simplified pore geometries). The development of multitechnique approaches is particularly promising for the most realistic description of gas storage and transport in shale. While they provide useful insight into the adsorption process on a molecular level, these numerical approaches remain computationally expensive, requiring the application of parallel computing to offset this cost, as has been successfully demonstrated for lattice Boltzmann methods. , Pore-scale numerical approaches, such as the lattice density functional theory (lattice DFT), have been shown to be a practical, yet physically sound, compromise for the description of supercritical gas adsorption in porous solids. , The lattice DFT model incorporates the pore size distribution of the adsorbent to describe the adsorption behavior on a pore-by-pore basis, and it explicitly accounts for adsorbate–adsorbate and adsorbate–adsorbent interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%