2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore Shape Modification of a Microporous Metal–Organic Framework Using High Pressure: Accessing a New Phase with Oversized Guest Molecules

Abstract: Pressures up to 0.8 GPa have been used to squeeze a range of sterically 'oversized' C5-C8 alkane guest molecules into the cavities of a small-pore Sc-based metal-organic framework. Guest inclusion causes a pronounced reorientation of the aromatic rings of one third of the terephthalate linkers, which act as 'torsion springs', resulting in a fully reversible change in the local pore structure. The study demonstrates how pressure-induced guest uptake can be used to investigate framework flexibility relevant to '… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, both of these effects appear to actually increase the pore volume, with an increase of 1105 Å 3 on increasing the pressure from ambient to 2.1 GPa (Table S2). This is similar to behaviour observed on increasing pressure in other MOFs, such as ZIF‐8, HKUST‐1, Sc 2 BDC 3 and ZAG‐based MOFs, where ligand flexibility facilitates significant pore volume and content changes, though the changes observed here are much smaller, and the mechanism (i.e. increase in population of a conformer that is less favourable under ambient conditions), is completely new.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In addition, both of these effects appear to actually increase the pore volume, with an increase of 1105 Å 3 on increasing the pressure from ambient to 2.1 GPa (Table S2). This is similar to behaviour observed on increasing pressure in other MOFs, such as ZIF‐8, HKUST‐1, Sc 2 BDC 3 and ZAG‐based MOFs, where ligand flexibility facilitates significant pore volume and content changes, though the changes observed here are much smaller, and the mechanism (i.e. increase in population of a conformer that is less favourable under ambient conditions), is completely new.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…6 Aside from the many attractive features of MOFs (e.g., huge surface area and low crystal density), construction of networks with tailored porosity and a prospective application have been the main highlight. [7][8][9] A major drawback to the success of the rational and predesigned synthesis of robust porous materials has been the limited access to the pores within open structures. 10 This is a critical aspect to the utility of these structures and occurs due to either self-interpenetration 11 as observed for very open frameworks or strong host-guest interactions that lead to the destruction of the host framework when removal or exchange of guests is attempted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, some pressure-induced behaviors of flexible MOFs have been investigated [94][95][96][97]. However, the number of MOFs that have been exposed to mechanical stress is trivial in comparison to the immense number of MOFs that have been produced [61].…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Elasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%