2020
DOI: 10.3938/jkps.77.790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore Structure Analysis to Adsorb NOx Gas based on Porous Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predominant odor adsorption materials include activated carbon (El‐Merraoui et al., 2000) and zeolite (Bickel & Gounder, 2022) with micropores (below 2 nm), as well as bentonite (Zhong et al., 2022) and diatomite (Zhou et al., 2022) with mesopores (2–50 nm). These porous materials exhibit large specific surface areas (Lim et al., 2020; Sonwane & Bhatia, 2000) and, owing to their porous structure, can efficiently remove sulfur compounds and carbon dioxide via van der Waals adsorption (Abdulrasheed et al., 2018; Chung et al., 2021; Jeong & Yoo, 2020). However, porous media has disadvantages such as short breakthrough time, low adsorption capacity, and poor selectivity (Abdulrasheed et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominant odor adsorption materials include activated carbon (El‐Merraoui et al., 2000) and zeolite (Bickel & Gounder, 2022) with micropores (below 2 nm), as well as bentonite (Zhong et al., 2022) and diatomite (Zhou et al., 2022) with mesopores (2–50 nm). These porous materials exhibit large specific surface areas (Lim et al., 2020; Sonwane & Bhatia, 2000) and, owing to their porous structure, can efficiently remove sulfur compounds and carbon dioxide via van der Waals adsorption (Abdulrasheed et al., 2018; Chung et al., 2021; Jeong & Yoo, 2020). However, porous media has disadvantages such as short breakthrough time, low adsorption capacity, and poor selectivity (Abdulrasheed et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is efficient for NO removal and potentially utilized for high-temperature processes. The performance of catalysts is prone to contaminants in feedstock; v) other methods such as biological treatment [9,10], adsorption on the surface of porous materials [11][12][13], and combustion modification are also considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, some studies have aimed to improve the adsorption efficiency by adding acids or heavy metals [14,16,17]. For example, studies of zeolite, which can effectively remove SO x and nitrogen oxides, have reported a significant difference in adsorption efficiency depending on the durability, pore structure, size, and shape of the zeolite [18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%