2020
DOI: 10.3390/min10010072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore Structure and Fractal Characteristics of Different Shale Lithofacies in the Dalong Formation in the Western Area of the Lower Yangtze Platform

Abstract: The purpose of this article was to quantitatively investigate the pore structure and fractal characteristics of different lithofacies in the upper Permian Dalong Formation marine shale. Shale samples in this study were collected from well GD1 in the Lower Yangtze region for mineral composition, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and nitrogen adsorption–desorption analysis, as well as broad-ion beam scanning electron microscopy (BIB-SEM) observation. Experimental results showed that the TOC (total organic carbon) content… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
62
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The XRD device was used with Cu Kαradiation at 40 mA and 40 kV, and carried out in a 2θ range of 3 • to 45 • with a step size of 0.02 • and a scanning speed of 2 • /min. Quantification phase analysis was conducted with the value K method, following the Chinese oil and gas industry standard SY/T 5163-2018 [38][39][40], in which the relative deviation of test results is less than 10%, when mineral content is more than 40%. When the mineral standard and corundum are formulated into a two-phase mixture in a ratio of 1:1 by mass, the reference strength of the mineral i can be calculated as Equation (1).…”
Section: Sample Collection Preparation and Analytical Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XRD device was used with Cu Kαradiation at 40 mA and 40 kV, and carried out in a 2θ range of 3 • to 45 • with a step size of 0.02 • and a scanning speed of 2 • /min. Quantification phase analysis was conducted with the value K method, following the Chinese oil and gas industry standard SY/T 5163-2018 [38][39][40], in which the relative deviation of test results is less than 10%, when mineral content is more than 40%. When the mineral standard and corundum are formulated into a two-phase mixture in a ratio of 1:1 by mass, the reference strength of the mineral i can be calculated as Equation (1).…”
Section: Sample Collection Preparation and Analytical Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obvious that D 2 is generally less than D 1 , indicating that the surface roughness and micropore irregularity of the pore system of transitional shale are slightly stronger than the heterogeneity of the whole pore structure. Compared with the transitional facies shale in other basins, the fractal dimension of shale samples in FB area is significantly higher than that of Dalong Formation in Lower Yangtze Platform (D ranges from 2.511 to 2.619) (Xu et al 2020) and Shihezi Formation in Huainan coalfield (D 1 ranges from 2.4750 to 2.6104) (Bu et al 2015) and slightly higher than that of Niutitang and Longmaxi Formation in Lower Cambrian strata (Hu et al 2016;Xi et al 2018). Hence, the result may suggest that the surface roughness and pore structure heterogeneity of shale samples in this study is more complex compared to other marine-continental transitional shale.…”
Section: Heterogeneity Of Pore Systemmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Previous studies have proposed different methods and models to obtain fractal dimension, including fractal Frenkel-Halsey-Hill (FHH) model, Langmuir model, thermodynamic model, fractal BET model and MIP (Avnir and Jaroniec 1989;Jaroniec 1995;Rouquerol et al 1994). Among above methods and models, FHH model is considered as the most effective approach to obtain the fractal dimension and describe the irregular geometry of pore structure of shale (Shang et al 2020;Sun et al 2016;Xu et al 2020). The FHH fractal dimension can be directly obtained from N 2 adsorption and can be described as follows: where V and P 0 represent the equilibrium volume of adsorbed N 2 (cm 3 /g) and the saturation pressure of N 2 (MPa), respectively.…”
Section: Heterogeneity Of Pore Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nitrogen isotherms recorded in Figure 4 for CaO/Al2O3 showed hysteresis over the relative pressure. The N2 isotherms exhibited a typical s-shaped behavior of type IV with a type H1 desorption hysteresis loop as categorised by IUPAC [56][57][58], indicating a potential presence of relatively wide cylindrical pores [59,60], which shows characteristics of The specific surface area and pore volume were determined by the nitrogen adsorptiondesorption technique summarised in Table 2, using Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET). The nitrogen isotherms recorded in Figure 4 for CaO/Al 2 O 3 showed hysteresis over the relative pressure.…”
Section: Bifunctional Catalyst Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nitrogen isotherms recorded in Figure 4 for CaO/Al 2 O 3 showed hysteresis over the relative pressure. The N 2 isotherms exhibited a typical s-shaped behavior of type IV with a type H1 desorption hysteresis loop as categorised by IUPAC [56][57][58], indicating a potential presence of relatively wide cylindrical pores [59,60], which shows characteristics of a mesoporous material [61,62].…”
Section: Bifunctional Catalyst Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%