2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(02)01420-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore structure of raw and purified HiPco single-walled carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
141
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
9
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since purified CNTs have very large surface area (1587 m 2 /g) 203 and extremely high conductivity, CNT composite show low threshold and sharp slope of percolation conductivity around the threshold. Thus, the sensors using CNT composite as sensing materials have higher sensitivity.…”
Section: Security and Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since purified CNTs have very large surface area (1587 m 2 /g) 203 and extremely high conductivity, CNT composite show low threshold and sharp slope of percolation conductivity around the threshold. Thus, the sensors using CNT composite as sensing materials have higher sensitivity.…”
Section: Security and Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] The incorporation of carbon nanotubes has the potential to address a variety of long-standing issues with respect to biosensing. In particular, the high surface area of single-walled CNTs (SWNTs), estimated as high as 1600 m 2 g −1 , [24] while maintaining electrical conductivity is of particular interest to achieve high biomolecule densities suitable for device miniaturization. This is further augmented by the ballistic transport of electrons or holes through SWNTs, with current densities as high as 10 9 A cm −2 in the presence of oxygen, [18,25] along with prevention of current-induced migration of metal contacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highly adhesive structure of the raw SWCNTs resulted in difficulties with gas adsorption accessibility [19]. Therefore, the measured surface area of the raw SWCNTs was significantly smaller than the theoretical BET area (3000 m 2 g −1 for open nanotubes 3 nm in diameter with 0.4 nm spacing between the walls of two adjacent tubes) [25]. Most importantly, the adhesive structure of the raw SWCNTs led to an uneven distribution of particles on the filter surface [20].…”
Section: Swcnt Disksmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A debundling process to open the ends of the tubes was therefore necessary prior to bucky paper production by filtration. Surfactant (or organic solvent [25]) treatment and ultrasonic processes [24] can aid the . Volume of eluent: DD-disk system, methanol, 15 mL; ENVI™-18 DSK disk, methanol, 7 m; Empore™ activated carbon disk, methylene chloride, 80 mL homogenization of the particles, reduce bundle size and enhance the external area of the SWCNTs, as shown by the experiment of Zheng et al [22].…”
Section: Swcnt Disksmentioning
confidence: 99%