2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore - Throat size distribution indices and their relationships with the petrophysical properties of conventional and unconventional clastic reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One hundred and thirty‐nine samples were analysed with AutoPore IV9500 mercury porosimeter to characterize capillary pressure curves and parameters, PSD, as well as pore‐throats connectivity (El Sharawy & Gaafar, 2019; Lai, Wang, Wang, et al, 2018; Pittman, 1992; Swanson, 1981). When the intrusion pressure reached the maximum pressure of 30 MPa, the mercury was expelled from the sample as the pressure progressively decreased.…”
Section: Samples and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One hundred and thirty‐nine samples were analysed with AutoPore IV9500 mercury porosimeter to characterize capillary pressure curves and parameters, PSD, as well as pore‐throats connectivity (El Sharawy & Gaafar, 2019; Lai, Wang, Wang, et al, 2018; Pittman, 1992; Swanson, 1981). When the intrusion pressure reached the maximum pressure of 30 MPa, the mercury was expelled from the sample as the pressure progressively decreased.…”
Section: Samples and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computed values of fractal dimension based on these models differ from each other. Their relationship with the rock heterogeneity is always similar in a way that the greater the fractal dimension, the stronger the heterogeneity of the rock's pore structure (Li, 2010;Li et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2017;Song et al, 2018;Xiao et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018;Sharawy and Gaafar, 2019). This is because these models are derived theoretically and interrelated on the basis of fractal modeling of porous media (Li, 2004;Li et al, 2010;Song et al, 2018).…”
Section: Fractal Dimension Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods can be utilized to characterize the heterogeneous pore structure of carbonate rocks, including their pore geometry, connectivity and size distribution. These techniques include optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), mercury intrusion capillary pressure (MICP), nitrogen gas adsorption (N2GA), nano X-ray computed tomography facility (CT), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and digital image analysis (Rezaee et al, 2012;Anovitz et al, 2013;Clarkson et al, 2013;Norbisrath et al, 2015;Gundogar et al, 2016;Cao et al, 2018;Njiekak et al, 2018;Xiao et al, 2018;Zhao et al, 2018;El Sharawy and Gaafar, 2019;Górniak, 2019). The combined use of multiple pore structure characterization methods (such as optical microscope, SEM, and the combination of MICP and N2GA tests) can reveal the wide range of pore sizes and pore size distributions (PSDs) from the nanometer to the micrometer scale (Ross and Bustin, 2009;Schmitt et al, 2013;Cao et al, 2015;Gao et al, 2019), their full aperture and the overall pore throat structure of tight carbonate cap rocks (Wu et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations