2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore typing using nuclear magnetic resonance, an example with samples from cretaceous pre-salt lacustrine carbonates in the Santos Basin, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be emphasized that the pre‐salt lacustrine carbonate reservoirs in the Santos Basin are characterized by strong heterogeneity, so it is necessary to calibrate the carbonate samples of different strata to obtain suitable T 2 cut‐off values. In addition, NMR logging is not sensitive to pore throat, so diagenesis can greatly affect the estimation of porosity and permeability (Belila et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be emphasized that the pre‐salt lacustrine carbonate reservoirs in the Santos Basin are characterized by strong heterogeneity, so it is necessary to calibrate the carbonate samples of different strata to obtain suitable T 2 cut‐off values. In addition, NMR logging is not sensitive to pore throat, so diagenesis can greatly affect the estimation of porosity and permeability (Belila et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SDR model was applied to calculate permeability based on the obtained T 2(lm) data, but the model did not provide good permeability predictions. As an alternative, Belila et al (2020) demonstrated that performing irreducible water saturation experiments is useful to define the Free‐Fluid Index (FFI) and the bulk volume irreducible (BVI) and consequently a FFI/BVI T 2 cut‐off of the pore network. This T 2 cut‐off can in turn be used to calculate permeability using the Timur–Coates equations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging is one of the preferred methods for porosity measurement in reservoirs due to the techniques relative insensitivity to changes in mineralogy and its reliability in estimating permeability (Boyd et al, 2015). Nuclear magnetic resonance, after calibration with laboratory measurements, consequently plays a central role in addressing complex pore geometries and other heterogeneities, certainly in combination with X‐ray computed tomography (XCT; Alabi et al, 2014; Belila et al, 2020; Chitale et al, 2014; Diniz‐Ferreira & Torres‐Verdín, 2012). In this paper, an integrated methodology for characterising the pore network, including petrography, XCT, mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) and laboratory NMR is tested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMR T 2 method provides a fast, easy, and non-destructive way of detecting hydrogenbearing fluids [33][34][35][36]. The NMR T 2 method is used to determine the petrophysical characteristics of conventional and unconventional porous media in oil and gas fields, such as porosity, pore geometry, pore connectivity, permeability, and even the fluid saturation in reservoirs [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Therefore, the NMR T 2 method is also widely used for monitoring the pore structure and the formation process of gas hydrate in sediments [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%