2018
DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_22_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porosity analysis of mineral trioxide aggregate Fillapex and BioRoot cements for use in endodontics using microcomputed tomography

Abstract: Aim:The purpose of this study is to compare the porosity of two sealant cements, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Fillapex® and BioRoot® root canal sealer (RCS). These samples were analyzed using microcomputed tomography.Materials and Methods:Sixteen samples were used in the study that were divided according to the composition of the materials used. MTA Fillapex® (n = 8) and BioRoot® RCS (n = 8) were the samples prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions. They were placed in silicone molds of 5 ± 0.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are no studies comparing the porosity of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine and BC Putty using Micro-CT analysis. One recent study using this methodology detected Biodentine less porous than ProRoot MTA (7). Moreover, it is important to emphasise that in the present study the Po% was still low and was not related to the formation of voids (VV%) as expected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are no studies comparing the porosity of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine and BC Putty using Micro-CT analysis. One recent study using this methodology detected Biodentine less porous than ProRoot MTA (7). Moreover, it is important to emphasise that in the present study the Po% was still low and was not related to the formation of voids (VV%) as expected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…One result did not invalidate the other one since both studies are complementary and necessary to better understand the performance of the materials. Regarding the porosity inherent to materials, the absence of pores is closely related to the achievement of both a low solubility and a better sealing (7). In contrast, their occurrence and size can be considered an extra cause of the formation of large voids which affects the internal morphology of the material (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using micro‐computed tomography (micro‐CT), the initial total porosity of hydraulic calcium silicate sealers was reported in the range 4.5%–5.5% (Guerrero et al, 2018; Milanovic et al, 2020; Viapiana et al, 2016). Using the water sorption method, the reported porosity was around 50% compared with 3% detected in epoxy resin‐based sealers (Siboni et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neves et al [ 35 ] compared and evaluated the porosity and pore size of glass ionomer cements with different viscosities using micro-CT, and Guerrero at al. [ 36 ] compared the porosity of Fillapex and BioRoot MTA for endodontic treatment. Similarly, Rattanassak et al [ 37 ] investigated the pore structure characteristics of cement/pozzolan composites using micro-CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%