2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-4105(01)00169-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porosity estimation using a combination of Wyllie–Clemenceau equations in clean sand formation from acoustic logs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of present‐day stratigraphic units differs from their original thicknesses due to the reduction of the primary porosity (Schneider et al., 1996). Therefore, we constructed separate porosity‐depth curves in each well based on density, neutron, and sonic logs (Kamel et al., 2002; Raiga‐Clemenceau et al., 1986; Wyllie et al., 1956). Where porosity logs were missing, the curves were generated empirically by adopting the approach of Steckler and Watts (1978) and constrained by data from nearby wells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The thickness of present‐day stratigraphic units differs from their original thicknesses due to the reduction of the primary porosity (Schneider et al., 1996). Therefore, we constructed separate porosity‐depth curves in each well based on density, neutron, and sonic logs (Kamel et al., 2002; Raiga‐Clemenceau et al., 1986; Wyllie et al., 1956). Where porosity logs were missing, the curves were generated empirically by adopting the approach of Steckler and Watts (1978) and constrained by data from nearby wells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of present-day stratigraphic units differs from their original thicknesses due to the reduction of the primary porosity (Schneider et al, 1996). Therefore, we constructed separate porosity-depth curves in each well based on density, neutron, and sonic logs (Kamel et al, 2002;Raiga-Clemenceau et al, 1986;Wyllie et al, 1956).…”
Section: Backstrippingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where x is an exponent specific to the matrix lithology. Kamel et al 5 ) proposed x = 55.196 × 8843 0 tma .…”
Section: Sedimentary Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Δ  based on the relationship between the matrix exponent (x) and the matrix transit time (Δtma). In addition, the following equation 5 ) was established by multiplying the time average of Eq. ( 1) and the Raiga-Clemenceau Eq.…”
Section: Sedimentary Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, SPyCRID generated a total of 32 data sets with non-unique φ calculated values upon its final iteration. To eliminate more erroneous data sets, data constraints were devised based on data sets having φ calculated values that deviate by less than 5% from the average φ measured value (Table 1), such as also done by Kamel, Mabrouk and Bayoumi (2002) and Lundegard (1992). Information on SPyCRID outputs and their respective φ calculated errors is tabulated in Table 2.…”
Section: E V E L O P M E N T O F S P Y C R I D F Ro M T H E M O D E Lmentioning
confidence: 99%