2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0264-8172(01)00049-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porosity loss in sand by grain crushing—experimental evidence and relevance to reservoir quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
86
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique is also much less laborious, very accurate and non-destructive (Roberts et al, 1998). These properties are very important because grain crushing can result in tighter grain packing and a reduction of the primary porosity (Chuhan et al, 2002), thereby yielding an incorrect measurement. Fig.…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This technique is also much less laborious, very accurate and non-destructive (Roberts et al, 1998). These properties are very important because grain crushing can result in tighter grain packing and a reduction of the primary porosity (Chuhan et al, 2002), thereby yielding an incorrect measurement. Fig.…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porosity is a primary determinant of the density and permeability of sediments; therefore, the porosity is a vital input for basin modelling (Chuhan et al, 2002). According to Poizot et al (2013), the permeability of a sand bed may also be correlated with the sand grains' size (mean, sorting and skewness) and sphericity in addition to the bed porosity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain-scale fracture and rearrangement are believed to be mechanisms of importance in controlling the porosity and permeability evolution of sedimentary rocks in rapidly subsiding basin settings [Chuhan et al, 2002[Chuhan et al, , 2003Donaldson et al, 1995]. They may also be of importance in controlling production-related compaction of hydrocarbon reservoir rocks, as a result of rapidly changing effective stresses, leading to surface subsidence [Doornhof et al, 2006;Hettema et al, 2002;Schutjens et al, 1994;Zoback and Byerlee, 1976].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the higher temperatures and pressures of deep burial, chemical compaction takes over and includes mineral growth and inter-granular pressure solution (e.g. Houseknecht, 1987;Chuhan et al, 2002;Paxton et al, 2002). Mechanical and chemical compaction processes are irreversible and eliminate inter-granular volume (IGV) that would otherwise remain fluidfilled or become occupied by cements that might dissolve during later diagenesis (Houseknecht, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the amount of cement derived by local grain dissolution is negligible or known. And third, the amount of framework mass exported by grain dissolution is negligible or known (Lundegard, 1992).The initial or depositional porosity for the Triassic Skagerrak sandstones samples is assumed to have been 45% (Bears and Weyl, 1973;Houseknecht, 1987;Lundegard, 1992;Chuhan et al, Cod sample sets, whereas the COPL-CEPL results of the Gaupe sample set indicate a more mixed porosity loss, albeit with a stronger tendency towards compaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%