2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.13722
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porosity phenomena of non-expansive, Banach space mappings

Abstract: For any non-trivial convex and bounded subset C of a Banach space, we show that outside of a σ-porous subset of the space of non-expansive mappings C → C, all mappings have the maximal Lipschitz constant one witnessed locally at typical points of C. This extends a result of Bargetz and the author from separable Banach spaces to all Banach spaces and the proof given is completely independent. We further establish a fine relationship between the classes of exceptional sets involved in this statement, captured by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following lemma can be proved completely analogously to the corresponding one in [11]. Since the proof is quite short, we include it nevertheless to keep this article self-contained.…”
Section: Behaviour Of the Local Lipschitz Constantmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following lemma can be proved completely analogously to the corresponding one in [11]. Since the proof is quite short, we include it nevertheless to keep this article self-contained.…”
Section: Behaviour Of the Local Lipschitz Constantmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The aim of this section is to extend one of the results of [11] to the setting of nonexpansive mappings on unbounded convex subsets of hyperbolic spaces. More precisely, we want to prove the following theorem.…”
Section: Behaviour Of the Local Lipschitz Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof. The approach we take to modify the mapping f to arrive at g is similar to that taken in [7,Lemma 3.3]. The conclusion of this lemma is valid for f if and only if it is valid for any mapping of the form f + p, where p : Q → Y is a constant mapping.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The next lemma is a generalisation of [7,Lemma 3.1] for normed spaces instead of convex sets. Lemma 3.1.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%