2020
DOI: 10.1177/1468798420938116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porous boundaries: Reconceptualising the home literacy environment as a digitally networked space for 0–3 year olds

Abstract: Most children growing up in contemporary homes in post-industrial countries use digital media as part of everyday literacy activities, such as to connect with distant family and friends, watch their favourite programmes, play games and find information. However, conceptualizations of the Home Literacy Environment (HLE) have not yet adapted to the implications of these comparatively new practices for young children’s knowledge about literacy or the ways in which they negotiate affectively intense relationships … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas research situated in sociocultural or socio-ecological perspectives emphasizes situated practices and how they are nested in larger ecologies, new research situated in sociomaterial and performative perspectives understands space as performed through practices. In a study of two toddlers video-calling relatives at home, Flewitt and Clark (2020) find that digital technologies participate in the performance of the home, not as a microsystem in young children's ecologies, but as a more networked space, reaching beyond its outer walls, as, for example, grandparents are recruited into the home on small screens. Gillen and Kucirkova (2018) study practitioners and children's innovative use of digital technologies in early years classrooms and similarly find that spaces are produced through flows that leave each space bleeding into other spaces-for example, through connections made to the young children's homes, facilitated by the use of digital technologies.…”
Section: Digital Technologies and Play In Early Childhoodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas research situated in sociocultural or socio-ecological perspectives emphasizes situated practices and how they are nested in larger ecologies, new research situated in sociomaterial and performative perspectives understands space as performed through practices. In a study of two toddlers video-calling relatives at home, Flewitt and Clark (2020) find that digital technologies participate in the performance of the home, not as a microsystem in young children's ecologies, but as a more networked space, reaching beyond its outer walls, as, for example, grandparents are recruited into the home on small screens. Gillen and Kucirkova (2018) study practitioners and children's innovative use of digital technologies in early years classrooms and similarly find that spaces are produced through flows that leave each space bleeding into other spaces-for example, through connections made to the young children's homes, facilitated by the use of digital technologies.…”
Section: Digital Technologies and Play In Early Childhoodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gillen and Kucirkova (2018) study practitioners and children's innovative use of digital technologies in early years classrooms and similarly find that spaces are produced through flows that leave each space bleeding into other spaces-for example, through connections made to the young children's homes, facilitated by the use of digital technologies. Boundaries between spaces are, in these studies, described as "porous" (Flewitt and Clark, 2020) and "percolating" (Gillen and Kucirkova, 2018), which relates to an important analytical point: a narrow focus on classroom and home practices as isomorphic with what happens inside the walls may fail to recognize the hybrid connections that are made after the digital.…”
Section: Digital Technologies and Play In Early Childhoodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They had to identify the object in the picture, identify the colour of the object and finally count the number of objects. This is in keeping with child development discourse where children learn and develop in stages and through repetition (Flewitt & Clark 2020). Whilst this may represent the child's developmental step towards getting school ready, these procedures can be construed as constructing a docile, literate individual who embodies respect for the positional power of the teacher and the early childhood institution.…”
Section: Disciplining the Body And Mind: Whole Group Teachingmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Taking cognisance of this situation, a reconceptualisation of the readiness processes should consider, via authentic evidence, what in reality prepares all children for learning (Brown 2017). It is important to recognise that children enter ECCE settings with a range of resources from their families to communities which have not previously been acknowledged as valuable and effective (Flewitt & Clark 2020). According to Manyak and Dantas (2011), these resources should be incorporated into early literacy practices rather than being replaced with school literacy instruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital technologies and media play a significant role within these social worlds (Flewitt & Clark, 2020; Kumpulainen & Gillen, 2017; Marsh et al, 2017). This role took on increased significance for children in this study during the transition to remote learning, when they were required to use digital conferencing platforms such as Google Meet.…”
Section: Children’s Social and Digital Livesmentioning
confidence: 99%