1986
DOI: 10.1080/00986448608911747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porous Dissolution Reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pore-throat diameter is the threshold reactivity diameter defined by Swift and Fogler (1977), which represents the pore-throat size above which the dissolution has the largest effect. Previous studies have also shown that chemical dissolution primarily influences larger pores Rege, 1986, Rege andFogler, 1989). The MICP results are consistent with visual observations of the 3D tomograms indicating considerable enlarging of oomoldic pores.…”
Section: D Geometry Of the Dissolution Patternsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This pore-throat diameter is the threshold reactivity diameter defined by Swift and Fogler (1977), which represents the pore-throat size above which the dissolution has the largest effect. Previous studies have also shown that chemical dissolution primarily influences larger pores Rege, 1986, Rege andFogler, 1989). The MICP results are consistent with visual observations of the 3D tomograms indicating considerable enlarging of oomoldic pores.…”
Section: D Geometry Of the Dissolution Patternsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Several models for flow and reaction in porous media exist in the literature. A comprehensive review of these and other models is presented in Fogler and Rege (1985). Primary among these models are those by Lund and Fogler (1976) and by Walsh et al (1984).…”
Section: Summary Of Previous Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, this research represents yet another study of mass transfer with chemical reaction, a subject that has enriched the literature of chemical engineering (Astarita, 1967;Astarita et al, 1983;Fogler and Rege, 1986). In the vast majority of past cases, the chemical reactions are first order.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%