2013
DOI: 10.1093/imamat/hxt042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porous squeeze-film flow

Abstract: The squeeze-film flow of a thin layer of Newtonian fluid filling the gap between a flat impermeable surface moving under a prescribed constant load and a flat thin porous bed coating a stationary flat impermeable surface is considered. Unlike in the classical case of an impermeable bed, in which an infinite time is required for the two surfaces to touch, for a porous bed contact occurs in a finite contact time. Using a lubrication approximation an implicit expression for the fluid layer thickness and an explic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the non-dimensional Beavers-Joseph equation (30) will be adopted here. Following the approach developed by Knox et al [21] for the coupled squeeze film and porous substrate flow driven by an approaching flat plate, the pressure in the substrate is expanded as…”
Section: Gas Behaviour In the Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the non-dimensional Beavers-Joseph equation (30) will be adopted here. Following the approach developed by Knox et al [21] for the coupled squeeze film and porous substrate flow driven by an approaching flat plate, the pressure in the substrate is expanded as…”
Section: Gas Behaviour In the Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knox et al. (2015) and Venerus (2018), have considered the addition of a porous boundary. Figure 6 shows the difference between our model and one considering a constant force on the boundary rather then the relaxation of a linear elastic one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…knee and hip, Knox et al. 2015; Karmakar & Raja-Sekhar 2018), soft robotics (Matia & Gat 2015) and various microfluidic applications (Christov et al. 2018; Wang & Christov 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7b illustrates the two lubricant loss mechanisms that are suggested for the hydrogel contact: squeeze-out of lubricant from the contact region and loss due to fluid flow into the porous hydrogel structure. 43,44 This resembles the mechanism of squeeze film lubrication, where a lubricating film initially forms due to the fast approach of two surfaces, thus 'trapping' the lubricant. Since the fluorescent profiles show an initial presence of the lubricant, such a film was likely formed in the contact.…”
Section: Relationship Between Friction and Replenishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The film subsequently diminishes because of the squeezeout flow from contact and fluid flow into the porous material. 43,44 This loss of lubricant can explain the rapid increase in friction in the first few seconds of a test.…”
Section: Relationship Between Friction and Replenishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%