The 16s ribosomal DNA-based phylogenetic positions of various members of the Methylococcuceue (group I methadotrophs) were investigated. The Methylococcuceue as a whole formed a distinct branch in the gamma subdivision of the Proteobucteria, and this branch had five distinct subbranches. On the basis of a number of phenotypic traits, phospholipid fatty acid patterns, and the results of a 16s ribosomal DNA analysis, we determined that the species belonging to one subbranch, Methylobucter ulbus, Methylobucter agilis, and Methylobucter peZugicus, formed a distinct group that could be differentiated from other members of the genus Methylobucter, which grouped in an adjacent subbranch. We propose that these species belong to a new taxon, Methylornicrobiurn gen. nov.Methanotrophs are organisms which obligately use C, compounds, primarily methane, as sources of carbon and energy. Recently, workers have tried to clarify methanotroph relationships and have found that several methanotroph species are invalid and that the intergeneric relationships of these organisms are rather chaotic. Methanotrophs have been difficult to identify conclusively because information concerning their phenotypic and chemotaxonomic properties is limited. This has led to nomenclatural problems, especially problems concerning assignment of species to genera. Using a more thorough polyphasic taxonomic approach, workers have evaluated the species and genus organization of the methanotroph groups and have redefined several species and genera. This has resulted in emendation of the description of the genus Methylococcus and creation of the genus Methylobacter. The group I1 methanotrophs were elevated to official status in the form of the genera Methylocystis and Methylosinus (2). In this study we found that analysis of phospholipid fatty acid profiles was the best technique for identifying methanotrophs to the genus level; the results of phospholipid fatty acid profile analyses, in association with key phenotypic traits, could be used for effective identification of the various methanotrophic species. The phylogenetic relationships of various methanotrophs have also been investigated by using 5s rRNA sequence analysis (1) and 16s rRNA sequence analysis (3, 4). These sequence analyses revealed that there is significant heterogeneity among the members of the Methylococcaceae (group I methanotrophs), which apparently was reflected by the chaotic state of methanotroph nomenclature at the time of the studies. Although recent nomenclatural changes (2) have corrected some of the problems, in this study we used phylogenetic analysis to confirm and evaluate the recent nomenclatural changes made to members of the Methylococcaceae and to determine if additional nomenclatural changes are necessary.All Methylomonas and Methylobacter strains except Methylobacter pelagicus strains were grown on nitrate mineral salts agar (2) under a methane-air-CO, (5:4:1) atmosphere at 28°C. Methylococcus strains were grown at 45°C. Methylobacter pelagicus NCMB 2265T (T = type str...