Port Competitiveness and the EU ‘Port Services’ Directive: the Case of Greek Ports

Abstract

The European Union (EU) institutions have discussed but failed to agree on a proposal for a ‘port services’ directive that would introduce free market access to port services provision. This paper examines the impact that this EU policy initiative could have on Greek ports. A reform towards port devolution has characterised the national port policy since 2002. The paper analyses the responses of the first post-reform CEOs to a questionnaire on the draft EU proposal, in order to establish whether this temporary EU policy failure would work in favour of Greek ports. The research findings suggest that the adoption of an EU regulatory framework would reinforce the quality of services provided by Greek ports and advance an essential restructuring of the Greek port system, on the condition that it takes into account the specific local characteristics. By linking these results to the existing literature on port competitiveness and the current structures of Greek ports, the paper explains why Greek port authorities have endorsed a positive approach to the general aims of the proposed directive. Maritime Economics & Logistics (2005) 7, 116–140. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100132

Port Governance Reforms in Diversified Institutional Frameworks: Generic Solutions, Implementation Asymmetries

“…Trade unions successfully advocated the absence of substantial port labour reforms. Many personnel regulations (organograms, operational practices, dockers' payment schemes) remained the same, though port managers had long claimed that labour reforms were essential (Pallis and Vaggelas, 2005).…”

“…Trade unions successfully advocated the absence of substantial port labour reforms. Many personnel regulations (organograms, operational practices, dockers' payment schemes) remained the same, though port managers had long claimed that labour reforms were essential (Pallis and Vaggelas, 2005). Nor was there a new labour statute, as the national government continued to control the process of hiring employees (the recent governmental intentions for employing unemployed seafarers in ports are illustrative).…”

Conceptual Model Development of Sustainability Practices: The Case of Port Operations for Collaboration and Governance

“…The respondents were asked to indicate on a five-point Likert scale how important each of these items were for conceptualising sustainability practise in port operations (from 1-not very important to 5-very important). To enhance the external validity of the findings, the questionnaire was distributed to internal and external stakeholders engaged in port operations based on Winkelmans and Notteboom [36]; internal stakeholders (port operator) and three groups of external stakeholders including economic/contractual external (e.g., terminal operators), public policy (e.g., government bodies) and community/academic groups. Experts in various high positions in their organization were randomly selected to avoid deficiencies of knowledge.…”

Exploring the applicability of electronic markets to port governance

“…The latter refers to companies competing to provide the same services within the same terminal (World Bank, 2000) with concessioning standing as the dominant entry mode in this market. Apart from preventing monopoly pricing, those responsible for port policy design (European Commission, 2004) and port authorities (Pallis and Vaggelas, 2005) advance the introduction of such competition between a plurality of providers of port products/services/facilities, as an engine of innovation and specialisation (de Langen and Pallis, 2006). The monopolistic market structure of port services provision and any single corporate hierarchy are replaced by a network of organisations operating in different worlds of production.…”