2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00351-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Port State Jurisdiction and the Regulation of International Merchant Shipping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decision to close cruise terminals involves medical (the public health of port city residents and of passengers and crews on board vessels) and economic (the local economy of cruise destinations) considerations. Port states have a right under international law to determine entry conditions for cruise vessels (Marten 2014). The law only mandates ports to grant access when the vessel itself is at risk and thus does not accommodate the interest of the passengers and of the cruise vessel operator in the context of a pandemic.…”
Section: The Consequences Of Covid-19 For Maritime Sectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision to close cruise terminals involves medical (the public health of port city residents and of passengers and crews on board vessels) and economic (the local economy of cruise destinations) considerations. Port states have a right under international law to determine entry conditions for cruise vessels (Marten 2014). The law only mandates ports to grant access when the vessel itself is at risk and thus does not accommodate the interest of the passengers and of the cruise vessel operator in the context of a pandemic.…”
Section: The Consequences Of Covid-19 For Maritime Sectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For IMO Conventions Carlin (2002, 347). 38 Kasoulides (1993), Marten (2014), and Molenaar (2015, 291). 39 Marten (2014, 37-41).…”
Section: The Role Of Public Authorities In Port State Control and Imomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rise of the various memoranda of understanding since 1982 has set the ambitious aim of harmonising the enforcement standards within the region where the MoU was established [42]. However, the limits and complexity faced trying to achieve this goal has been highlighted by several publications in the past thirty years [2,4,10,14,17,22,38,39,43].…”
Section: Concluding Comments and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%