We thank Tripathi and colleagues for their interest in our review about the evidence gaps for the prevention and management of portal hypertension (PHT) and acute variceal bleeding in patients with HCC. [1] We agree that we are facing a lack of strong evidence regarding the use of nonselective beta-blockers (NSBB) in HCC patients with a liver stiffness measurement ≥ 25 kPa. However, we believe that NSBB might present beneficial properties, as NSBB prevents acute variceal bleeding, are associated with a lower liver cancer mortality rate and may reduce HCC occurrence. [2,3] Moreover, PHT is associated with worse outcome after locoregional treatment, such as liver decompensation and ascites occurrence that might preclude the access to further HCC treatment. It is therefore legitimate to question the prescription of NSBB to limit liver function worsening in patients at risk, as proposed by Baveno VII consensus. [4] In addition, no negative effects of the use of NSBB have been demonstrated.The other major point is the diagnosis of PHT in HCC patients since even the use of the HVPG, considered as the gold standard to diagnose PHT, does not seem to be adapted in this patient population. Indeed, in our series of BCLC-0/A, patients with HVPG <10 mm Hg, 1/ 26 (3.8%) presented large-size EV (Se 88%, Sp 64%, PPV 36%, and NPV 96%) and 6/26 (23.1%) small EV (Se 67%, Sp 63%, PPV 56%, and NPV 73%). So, we are not in favor of prescribing NSBB without endoscopy, only in patients with baseline HVPG ≥ 10 mm Hg. Other techniques need to be developed, such as spleen stiffness measurement or imaging score for the proper diagnosis of PHT in HCC patients.Although Tripathi et al [5] raised pertinent questions about the uncertainty of the literature regarding the use of NSBB in HCC patients, we still believe that the use of NSBB in patients with liver stiffness measurement of ≥ 25 kPa might improve their outcome and to date, no performant technique exists to diagnose PHT in this population of patients who appears as a major research issue.