2004
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.20202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portal hypertension develops in a subset of children with standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with oral 6‐thioguanine during maintenance therapy

Abstract: The evaluations of these 12 patients suggest that treatment with TG causes injury to the liver leading to PH and that thrombocytopenia and splenomegaly are clinical hallmarks of this toxicity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 As a consequence, 6-MP has remained the preferred drug for maintenance therapy. Veno-occlusive disease, as reported in other studies, 21,22 did not occur in COALL patients. This was also true for trial ALL-REZ 90 for relapsed patients, in which 6-TG was used together with weekly intravenous MTX in maintenance therapy (G Henze, personal communication).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…5 As a consequence, 6-MP has remained the preferred drug for maintenance therapy. Veno-occlusive disease, as reported in other studies, 21,22 did not occur in COALL patients. This was also true for trial ALL-REZ 90 for relapsed patients, in which 6-TG was used together with weekly intravenous MTX in maintenance therapy (G Henze, personal communication).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Recognition of portal hypertension as a possible life-threatening complication of TG created an unambiguous imbalance between its risks and potential benefits. 47 Although use of TG for a short time frame early in the treatment of boys with ALL may seem an attractive therapeutic strategy, the side effects of TG limit this approach. Furthermore, the therapeutic benefit of TG may be redundant in the face of dexamethasone treatment in SR-ALL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the standard-risk patients, the treatment protocols were modified from the Children's Cancer Group (CCG)-1891 34 or CCG-1952 protocols. 35 The regimen used was switched to a modified one from the CCG-1882 protocol 36 from consolidation chemotherapy, if the percentage of bone marrow leukemic blasts on day 7 was greater than 25% during induction chemotherapy. If the percentage of leukemic blasts on day 14 was still greater than 25%, the protocol used for the high-risk patients was restarted.…”
Section: Patients and Treatment Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%