Portal venous aneurysms (PVA) are a rare venous aneurysms. The mean diameter of a healthy portal vein varies considerably, with maximum diameter of 15 mm in healthy subjects and 19 mm in cirrhotic patients. The presentation varies; they could come with abdominal pain or more often as an incidental, asymptomatic finding. Although risk factors like portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis have been highlighted, the aetiology remains to be clarified. PVA may be associated with various complications: thrombosis, aneurysmal rupture, inferior vena cava obstruction or duodenal compression. A conservative treatment showed satisfying clinical and radiological response, however, surgical and endovascular options can be considered. The aetiology and the mechanism of formation of PVA remain ill defined. We aimed to use the small cohort of cases to define the distribution and radiological features of PVA and not for determining its prevalence or details of management. We retrospectively reviewed 6 cases from our institution with variable presentations, complications and outcomes. Contrary to the published literature where most of the PVA’s are described in extrahepatic portal vein and portal-splenic vein confluence, majority of our cases (66%) were found to be in intrahepatic locations. In our study, two (33%) of the patients had portal vein thrombosis and were symptomatic. PVA was associated with cirrhosis and portal hypertension in only one patient (16%). These findings support the hypothesis that chronic liver disease and portal hypertension may be contributory but are not essential factor in the development of portal venous system aneurysm. Our review revealed that portal venous system aneurysms were mostly incidental, single, not gender or age specific and were frequently (66%) intrahepatic. Main portal vein was involved in 3 cases and splenic vein in only one case. Most of the portal venous system aneurysms were fusiform in configuration. Although PVAs are rare, more cases are detected through imaging. Hepatobiliary surgeons, gastroenterologists and radiologists should be aware of this entity, as it can have a wide variety of clinical spectrum. Our review and the limited evidence in published literature suggest that an individualized multidisciplinary team approach should be adopted to decide the best management and outcomes for each patient. The authors of this manuscript have no conflict of interests to disclose