Al alloys are becoming increasingly significant as lightweight metal structural materials in many industries, such as aircraft construction, space technology, military field and automobile manufacturing. Therefore, it is necessary to reveal the deformation mechanisms of Al alloys to magnify their further application field.Deformation at higher strain rates is considered as a method of enhancing the ductility of nanostructured metals and alloys. [1] Higher strain rates generate crystalline defects to compete with dynamic recovery at a higher rate and therefore increase the work hardening rate, which leads to higher ductility of the nanostructured metals and alloys. [2][3][4] Despite the above reports, there are some results revealing the contradictory behavior. Cheng reported that a nanostructured Cu had higher ductility at lower strain rates. [5] The abnormal strain rates effect cannot be explained by the above deformation mechanism at higher strain rates. Recently, it is observed the similar phenomenon in the present cast coarsegrained (CG) Al-Cu alloy. So far, very little work on the higher ductility at the lower strain rates for the coarse-grained metals and alloys has been published, especially for the cast Al-Cu alloy. Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate the reason for higher ductility at lower strain rates of 10 -4 s -1 and 10 -3 s -1 , and strain rate sensitivity at strain rates of 10 -2 s -1 and 10 -1 s -1 in the cast Al-Cu alloy modified by nano-scale Pr x O y .
ExperimentalThe compositions (measured by an ARL 4460 Metals Analyzer) of the cast Al-Cu alloy were (in wt.%) 6.0 Cu, 0.15 Mn, 0.25 Ti, 0.13 V, 0.13 Zr, 0.001 B and balance Al. Details of the fabrication process for the present Al-Cu alloys are described elsewhere. [6] The heat-treated cast Al-Cu alloys were cut into tensile dog-bone shaped specimens with a gauge cross-section of 2.5 mm × 2.0 mm and a gauge length of 8.0 mm. Specimen surfaces were polished to a mirror-like finish surface. The uniaxial tensile tests at room temperature were carried out on an MTS-810 tester (U.S.A.) at the strain rate (e) ranging from 1 × 10 -4 s -1 to 1 × 10 -1 s -1 . The tensile ductility in this study was measured by calculating the gauge length change of the specimen before and after the tensile test. The mechanical property data (with a typical uncertainty of ± 1 %) in this study are the mean value of at least two specimens. Fracture morphologies and microstructures were examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Model JSM-5310, Japan) and the transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEM-2000FX, Japan), respectively. Figure 1 shows the typical TEM microstructures of the present Al-Cu alloy after the tensile test at e of (a) 1 × 10 -4 s -1 , (b) 1 × 10 -2 s -1 , (c) 1 × 10 -3 s -1 and (d) 1 × 10 -4 s -1 , respectively. As shown in Figure 1(a), some dislocations are tangled around the nano-scale needle-like precipitates. The nanoscale needle-like precipitates were identified as the h′ phase precipitates with a composition of Al 2 Cu ...