Portfolio Analysis of Carbon Sequestration Technologies and Barriers to Adoption: General Methodology and Application to Geological Storage

Young-Lorenz, Jillian D.; Lumley, David

doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.420

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A third, small field, F8.3 (10 papers, 5.5% of C8), contained papers that go beyond a techno-economic perspective. Key papers included Young-Lorenz and Lumley [179] (d = 203), who used a semi-quantitative methodology to assess various diverse CCS technologies using six different evaluation criteria; Kuckshinrichs [180] The nodes of this cluster were quite interspersed, so assignments other than those described below might also be possible. The cluster also shows the smallest spread of degrees, reaching a maximum degree of 113.…”

Section: Cluster C5 (Pink 255 Nodes 6%)-the Chemistry Of Capture Anmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis

Viebahn

Chappin

2018

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For many years, carbon capture and storage (CCS) has been discussed as a technology that may make a significant contribution to achieving major reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. At present, however, only two large-scale power plants capture a total of 2.4 Mt CO 2 /a. Several reasons are identified for this mismatch between expectations and realised deployment. Applying bibliographic coupling, the research front of CCS, understood to be published peer-reviewed papers, is explored to scrutinise whether the current research is sufficient to meet these problems. The analysis reveals that research is dominated by technical research (69%). Only 31% of papers address non-technical issues, particularly exploring public perception, policy, and regulation, providing a broader view on CCS implementation on the regional or national level, or using assessment frameworks. This shows that the research is advancing and attempting to meet the outlined problems, which are mainly non-technology related. In addition to strengthening this research, the proportion of papers that adopt a holistic approach may be increased in a bid to meet the challenges involved in transforming a complex energy system. It may also be useful to include a broad variety of stakeholders in research so as to provide a more resilient development of CCS deployment strategies.

show abstract

Section: Cluster C5 (Pink 255 Nodes 6%)-the Chemistry Of Capture Anmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis

Viebahn

Chappin

2018

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The use and dissemination of CC(U)S-carbon capture, (utilization) and storage technologies-is a promising measure to control carbon dioxide emissions [20,[33][34][35]. The typology of such technologies includes CCUS (carbon capture, utilization, and storage), CCS (carbon capture and storage) and CCU (carbon capture and utilization) technologies [36][37][38].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

CC(U)S Initiatives: Public Effects and “Combined Value” Performance

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The changes in climate, which are associated with the emission of anthropogenic greenhouse gases, have been widely discussed by scientists and specialists during the last few decades. The promising way to reduce CO2 emission is to implement CC(U)S technologies (carbon capture, (utilization) and storage). However, CC(U)S initiatives are challenging that prevent their widespread adoption. The main purpose of the research is to prove that CC(U)S should be considered broader than a way to reduce emission, and such initiatives could lead to various public effects and create long-term “combined value” for the industry and wider society; all of these should be considered when making decisions on CC(U)S implementation. The results of the research are presented by highlighting bi-directional interaction between CC(U)S and society, including public acceptance and public effects; identifying the possible positive and negative impact of CC(U)S initiatives on the public; developing a system of indicators for assessing the public effects of CC(U)S; proposing the framework for a value at stake analysis (VAS) of CC(U)S initiatives in order to reveal and assess their “combined value”. The methodology of this study includes desk studies, decomposition technique, environment (E), health (H) and safety (S) (EHS) approach, classification techniques, and VAS analysis.

show abstract

“…the US Interagency Taskforce on CCS (2010) or the Global CCS Institute (2011). See also Bachu (2008), Bäckstrand et al (2011, p. 277), Davies et al (2013) or Young-Lorenz & Lumley (2013) for publications in the academic domain.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Our climate, our underground

Oost¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:

show abstract

Portfolio Analysis of Carbon Sequestration Technologies and Barriers to Adoption: General Methodology and Application to Geological Storage

Cited by 11 publications

References 16 publications

Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis

Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis

CC(U)S Initiatives: Public Effects and “Combined Value” Performance

Our climate, our underground

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About