2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2016.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portfolio choice in retirement: Health risk and the demand for annuities, housing, and risky assets

Abstract: In a life-cycle model, a retiree faces stochastic health depreciation and chooses consumption, health expenditure, and the allocation of wealth between bonds, stocks, and housing. The model explains key facts about asset allocation and health expenditure across health status and age. The portfolio share in stocks is low overall and is positively related to health, especially for younger retirees. The portfolio share in housing is negatively related to health for younger retirees and falls significantly in age.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we set the parameter values for the benchmark case. In accordance with Pang and Warshawsky (2010) and Yogo (2012) we set β, the time-preference discount factor, equal to 0.96. The risk aversion coefficient γ is assumed equal to 5 for ease of comparison, since this is equivalent to Pang and Warshawsky (2010) and close to the parameter choice of Yogo (2012) and Ameriks et al (2011).…”
Section: Benchmark Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we set the parameter values for the benchmark case. In accordance with Pang and Warshawsky (2010) and Yogo (2012) we set β, the time-preference discount factor, equal to 0.96. The risk aversion coefficient γ is assumed equal to 5 for ease of comparison, since this is equivalent to Pang and Warshawsky (2010) and close to the parameter choice of Yogo (2012) and Ameriks et al (2011).…”
Section: Benchmark Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davidoff (2010) argues that since the desired level of housing consumption also declines after a large health shock, housing equity serves as an ideal saving device for out-of-pocket medical expenditures. Yogo (2009) provides a model with health investments and adjustment costs that also predicts that households primarily dissave in the form of housing equity after a large health shock.…”
Section: Housing and Portfolio Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical expenses related to a chronic condition last for a long time, which gradually drains household savings. Yogo (2009) finds that individuals primarily reduce housing equity in response to a large decline in self-reported health between two waves of the HRS.…”
Section: Housing and Portfolio Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lockwood (2012) considers the low demand for long-term-care insurance as evidence of the relative importance of bequest motives versus precautionary motives. Finally, we abstract from risky asset returns or portfolio allocation decision of retirees with health risks (except for financial versus housing assets), which Yogo (2016) studies. Instead, we focus more on differences in the medical and LTC expense risk between the U.S. and Sweden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%